Aquino urged to rethink 12-year education cycle
To help reverse the decline in the quality of Philippine education, the incoming Aquino administration is mulling adding two more years to the country's basic education cycle--an additional year in elementary and another year in high school.
But, speaking on ANC's "The Rundown" on Tuesday night, an education expert says this may not be a realistic solution.
"Why are we trying to complicate the problem? Prolonging the cycle may not really address the issue. The crisis is, children are not learning, and children are dropping out. So, I think we should focus all our resources on enabling all the children to complete grade 6, math and reading and be good citizens," says Milwida Guevarra, president and CEO of Synergeia Foundation.
Synergeia Foundation is an organization that aims to transform basic education in collaboration with local governments, parents and the private sectors.
Guevarra adds, all that's needed is a do-able solution, which includes empowering the parents and local governments to share part of the engagement of children in schools.
Guevarra says the incoming administration should instead make efficient use of government resources, focus on training teachers, and make education a shared responsibility.
Aquino's campaign manager Florencio "Butch" Abad, who is rumored to be the education secretary of the Aquino government, earlier said that Aquino proposed a 12-year education cycle as part of his 10-point agenda. The plan supposedly includes 7 years of primary and 5 years of secondary education.
Address corruption
Guevarra also stresses the need to address bad governance, corruption and poor management of resources in the education sector.
"The studies document corruption eats up 50% of the budget of DepEd [Department of Education] because of under-the-table transactions and commissions," says Guevarra.
"Our resources are very limited, and they should be focused on keeping the young children in schools," Guevarra says.
She notes that 20% of children drop out as early as grade 2, while the education system loses as much as 70% of grade 6 students in very depressed areas.
Passing mark
Guevarra gives the Arroyo administration just a passing mark for education.
"I would give her the same grade as average performance of children below 75%," Guevarra says.
"She's accountable for that except that the central government is too remote. And that's why we're saying, even the barangay officials, it should be their responsibility to look out for children who are dropping out and call the attention of the parents. Why are you letting this child work at home? Why aren't you sending him to school? I'm sorry, it happened during President [Cory] Aquino's time that the drop-out rate has risen and the performance level has become so low," she says.
'Smooth opening' of classes
Meanwhile, the Department of Education (DepEd) says the smooth outcome of the opening of classes on Monday was very encouraging.
"The opening of classes was smooth and orderly. We're happy to note the eagerness of our students," Education Secretary Mona Valisno said on ANC's Rundown on Tuesday.
But, she admits, some schools did not have enough chairs. Valisno admits the growing student population remains a tough challenge, amid persistent problems with overcrowded classrooms.
Valisno says 95 out of 6,600 high schools, mostly in Metro Manila, have three shifts a day, and this will have to be met by building more classrooms.
Zero drop-out rate
Valisno says the Arroyo administration has also doubled the budget for education, from P100 billion in 2001 to P235 billion today, in hopes of making education available to all.
The DepEd boasts of having an unprecedented zero drop-out rate from first year to fourth year high school in at least four provinces: Zamboanga Sibugay, Cotabato, Southern Leyte, and Romblon, a feat achieved through effective intervention programs via the DepEd's Drop Out Reduction Program (DORP).
"We would like to encourage everyone to go to school, all the dropouts the past years. We want education for all, including those without credentials. We will do assessment to find out which grade level they belong. And for those who can't stay in the education stream, like the main education highway, we provide alternative learning system, accreditation program, home study program so they can proceed and study," she says.
Not too fast
Consider our countries overall picture, if we increase the number of years of education at our present rate wherein the number of drop outs starting from high school had been consistently increasing then our future generation would have produced more uneducated Filipinos if we apply an artificial solution to the problem. We compalin of a declining quality so why not upgrade the standard of the system because even if we increase the length of time this students have to stay in school but the books, some teachers, the support system like unhealthy environment, poor nutrition and improper guidance from the parents...proves to be inadequaate, then don't be surprised if the outcome tends towards the negative. Most of the Filipinos belong to the middle and below income, they could barely afford to send all of their kids to school. This are the parents who were hoping that after their kids finish college would land a descent job soon so that they could financialy help their family or in sending the other siblings to school. This is a true and major scenario in our country. So for those fortunate individuals that could afford to go abroad and boast of several degrees...donot blame our government for those missing years. Im sure you've noticed several of our neighboring asian countries who's citizens also lived among you abroad were not even at par with us in terms of speaking in English, yet they were able to work there. Perhaps instead of adding more years to be applied by all of our nations schools why not establish a school specially designed for those who intend to pursue further studies abroad. We had produced great students for several decades even if this crapped system had been in placed, so our goal now is how to better the system and in doing so does not necessarily mean that extending the cycle of the egg would produce an intelligent chicken.
2 Yr Basic Educ MUST Push Through
I strongly agree to have the Philippine Basic Education upgraded to 12 years.
We have already been left behind by other poor countries such as Vietnam, Fiji, Zimbabwe, Indonesia, etc. with our primitive education system.
As a Fil-Canadian, I have strongly felt the discrimination and the belittlement of holding a Philippine Degree (I have a Big-3 Degree).
Sa katunayan may kaibigan akong nabigyan ng scholarship ng isang Canadian State University ngunit matapos usisain ang kanyang mga papeles at nalaman na 10 taon lang ang basic education ng Pinas, binawi po ng Canadian University ang scholarship.
Kung galing Vietnam or Indonesia wala daw problema pero kung galing Pinas di daw nila tinatanggap for entry to University dahil kulang ang basic education.
Laging pinagmamalaki ng bansa natin na tayo ang pinakabihasa sa wikang English sa Asya ngunit sa mata ng mga puti, isa na tayo sa pinakabulok na bansa sa mundo. Dapat lamang na idagdag na ang 2 taon sa basic education upang ang antas ng edukasyon ng Pinas ay maging comparable sa ibang mga bansa sa mundo.
Milwida Guevarra, I suggest that you wake up and face reality. A 10 year Philippine Education will render Filipinos trying to gain success abroad disadvantaged over their competitors. To argue otherwise is plain ignorance.
12 years at least
Education should be at least twelve years. Fourteen would be preferable (include pre-kindergarten and kindergarten), but given the Philippines' budget problems, that isn't feasible right now.
More of the budget should be spent on education, although roads, and electricity (power plants and electrical grid networks) should take precedence.
This is somewhat off-topic, but useless government positions like the Vice Presidency and the Senate - and probably even the barangay councils - should be abolished. That would free up money, as would terminating all those minor, pointless, paper-pushing jobs that lead to graft. Tax fraud needs to be a greater concern to those in power.