Netizens react to Comelec ruling on Erap

Posted at 01/21/2010 12:41 PM | Updated as of 01/26/2010 2:12 PM

Yesterday, the Comelec junked the disqualification case against former president, Joseph Estrada, allowing him to run in the May 20-10 presidential elections. Their rationale: let the people decide.

Netizens were quick to react. The overwhelming majority of people who Tweeted ANC were opposed to allowing the former president to seek reelection. (@megra_amazona argued, "The Constitution provides that the President is not eligible for ANY REELECTION. How can that be interpreted in any other way?" (@kikaikai) tweeted, "He was convicted of plunder for misdeeds done during his presidency. Ano ito (What is this), trial and error? Once is enough - more than enough.” Meanwhile, @dregonz commented, "If a regular job requires NBI clearance, what more for the presidency?"

Others hit what they say was the poll body's flawed reasoning. @keep2mys3lf contended, "That's the craziest justification ever. If they don't care about the Constitution then what is it there for?" @athensgarrote added, "If they let the people decide, what's the point of having a Comelec to screen presidentiables? Let everybody run for President then."

But there was still a contingent of people who agreed with the Comelec. @ejhayreyes reasoned, "The Philippines is a democratic country; sovereignty resides in the people. Let the people decide come election day whether Erap is qualified." @ghemagno08 also thought the people should decide, but added "I think Filipino[s]...are intelligent enough to make [a] better choice."

Still others wanted Estrada to run for other reasons. @ymmandee said, "Let Estrada run, and lose the race! He's not going to win, anyway! That should teach him true humility!", while @martinmanuson said, "Let Erap run so he can eat up some of Noynoy's votes! He's not projected to win anyway."

ABS-CBN reporter, R.G. Cruz, also pointed out an interesting historical note: the Comelec decision came on the same day, exactly 9 years ago, that Estrada left Malacañang and President Arroyo was installed in office.

Over on ANC's new Facebook fan page (Facebook), Alberto Herras drew attention to the need for the Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of the Comelec's decision in order to avoid controversy in future cases and "assure the people that government institutions are still working within the Constitution.”

In the coming days, more and more discussions are expected in relation to the coming polls. So, keep telling us what you think. Add to the discussion on ANC's Facebook fan page or tweet us at @ANCALERTS. Have your say on whether you think we've learned from the past, or if history should be allowed to repeat itself.


Bookmark and Share

15 comments

guys

wag na natin sisihin comelec. wag na natin sisihin si erap. asa mga kamay naman natin ang pag boto at pag bigay edukasyon sa mga hindi masyado nag iisip. kung paniniwala mo parehas sakin na dapat wag na sya maging presidente, wag natin sya iboto. tularan natin to oh, ikalat ang balita kung bakit wag na dapat maging presidente si erap (http://pinoyrambler.wordpress.com/2010/01/13/erap-estrada-a-presidential...).
He had his chance, he blew it.


Only In the Philippines

The constitution is clear - to the simple mind. Sila lang nagpapakahirap sa interpretasyon, naghahanap yata ng loopholes...

@VTYEAR - Huwag mo i generalize lahat ng voters ng Cebu, baka hindi proud yung ibang "intelligent" voters na kayo naglagay kay Gloria sa malacanang... very intelligent choice nga! corrupt din...haha


OMG WHAT'S WRONG WITH OUR COUNTRY

FOR THE COMELEC AND SC TO SAY THAT LET THE PEOPLE DECIDE IS "RIDICULOUS". SILA ANG TINALAGA DIYAN PARA I-INTERPRET ANG BATAS. WAG NILANG IPASA SA TAO. PARA SILANG SI PILATO!

lun martinez

COMMAND VOTE!

ANG ISA DAPAT IPAGBAWAL AY ANG COMMAND VOTE NA NANGGALING SA MGA RELIGIOUS SECT!!
AT KUNG MAY INTERES NA MAGING PRESIDENTE, WAG NAMANG SANANG GAMITIN YUNG MGA "NANINIWALA" AT NAGPAPA-UTONG KASAPI NITO..

SINO BA YUN "KAPATID"?
"E DI AKO"!!


PATAS NA PAGBABALITA

5

VTYEAR... you should practice what you preach.

Hindi mo naman kinumpleto ang isinulat mo. Kaya nanalo si Gibo sa mock election after the forum diyan sa Cebu eh dahil sa higit sa kalahati ng mga nakapasok at ipinasok eh mga pulitiko at mga hakot nila, mula kay Gov. Gwen hanggang sa mga mayor na alipores na kaalyado ng administrasyon. It's actually amazing that Noynoy and the other presidentiables even got votes. Yung mga nasa labas ng forum, hindi naman pina-boto.

Get real.

Bangon Pilipinas!

the truth about tita cory

what Miriam told about Luisita.
On october 3, 2005, about a year after the november 16, 2004 Luisita masacre, Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago told the philippine star that luisita wan one of the Department of Agrarian Reform(DAR)in 1989.
I made the mistake of telling the press that I thought that president Aquino should inhibit herself as a chair of the presidential Agrarian Reform Council(PARC) which would make the final Decision on the stock option",
Santiago also called Luisita's SDO unconstitutional in the October 3, 2005 report. The general rule is for the farmeers. hy should there be an arbitrary exception for the cojuangco haciende?she said?


Ano ba ang nakasulat?

Ito po ang nakasulat sa Art 7 section 4:
Section 4. The President and the Vice-President shall be elected by direct vote of the people for a term of six years which shall begin at noon on the thirtieth day of June next following the day of the election and shall end at noon of the same date, six years thereafter. The President shall not be eligible for any re-election. No person who has succeeded as President and has served as such for more than four years shall be qualified for election to the same office at any time.

It is really written vaguely with lots of room of interpretation.
Anti-erap would say: "Erap, who once was a President shall not be eligible for any re-election. PERIOD."
Erap fans would say: "Erap is NOT THE PRESIDENT. He is a FORMER President. It should apply to the sitting president who wishes to be re-elected as rep of Pampanga.

The succeeding sentence clarifies the issue. It says, "NO PERSON who has succeeded as President and has served as such for more than four years shall be qualified for election to the same office at any time." This applies to ERAP.

Im just curious on how people think

PATAS NA PAGBABALITA

5

ABS-CBN IS ONE OF THE LEADING BROADCASTING NETWORK IN CEBU. I'M JUST CURIOUS WHY THEY DON'T HAVE IT THEIR HEADLINES WHAT HAPPENED IN CEBU YESTERDAY.

"GIBO" LEADS THE MOCK ELECTION MADE AFTER THEIR FORUM AND YOUR FAVORITE AB-NOY ONLY RANKS A FAR SECOND"

WONDER WHY? BECAUSE CEBU IS ALWAYS AND ALWAYS WILL BE THE HOME OF INTELLIGENT VOTERS - STATISTICALLY SPEAKING.

CEBUANOS DON'T VOTE FOR POPULARITY. WE LOOK FOR LEADERSHIP, MORAL INTEGRITY, CAPABILITY AND CREDIBILITY.


Ano pa ang silbi ng Saligang Batas?

Ano pa ang silbi ng Saligang Batas kung binabalewala rin lang ito? Kaya nga isinaad na di na pwedeng tumakbong muli ang isang naging pangulo na. Ang prblema kasi sa atin kung sino ang baluktot ang katwiran yun ang nananaig. Kung malinis ang konsiyensiya at malinis ang hangarin ng nagbabasa ng Saligang Batas di na kailangan pang pagtalunan ang nakasaad dito. Ke nakumpleto o hindi ang panunungkulan ng isang naging presidente ang sadya ng isinasaad ng Saligang Batas ay pagbawalan talaga na tumakbong muli ang isang naihalal na na pangulo. Pero tulad nga ng sinasabi ko, sa atin ang baluktot na katwiran ay panalo. Kaya nga maraming nakukulong na walang kasalanan dahil sa baluktot na katwiran ng mga may alam sa batas.


Good decision!

Vote for Erap!



Links