PGMA lawyer hits media's 'immorality'

Posted at 08/13/2009 11:24 AM | Updated as of 08/13/2009 11:24 AM

MANILA - The lawyer of President Arroyo has turned the tables on media after his client became the object of heavy criticism over the alleged $20,000 lavish dinner at Le Cirque in New York City.

Atty. Romulo Macalintal said media should not be talking about morals, since media owners themselves should be questioned on the same issue.

The President's lawyer insists media owners should practice morality by rejecting political advertisements since these could be circumventing the law.

"Kayo rin taga media companies, hindi ba yung moral issue is also involved dahil kung alam ninyo na yan ay mali, kung alam nyo na yan ay indirectly campaigning, kung alam na ninyo na yan pala ay imoral, bakit nyo inaadvertise? Why accept their advertisement? Hindi ba bahagi rin kayo ng pagiging immoral? (You in media companies, isn't it also a moral issue if you know it's wrong, if you know it's a form of indirect campaigning, if you already know it is immoral, then why advertise? Why accept the advertisement? Doesn't that also make you immoral?)," Macalintal said in an interview on ANC's Top Story on Wednesday.

Macalintal said media should also pose the same challenge to presidential aspirants who spend millions on their political advertisements when they could also use the money to help the poor.

The filing of candidacies starts November 20 and ends November 30.

Macalintal also hit reports that pegged the dinner tab in Le Cirque, New York of the presidential entourage at $20,000.

"Di ba hindi naman natin alam kung sino talaga nagsasabi na talagang $20,000 ang ginastos? Meron na ba talagang sinabi na ganito talaga? (We don't know who gave the amount of $20,000. Has anyone really mentioned $20,000?)," Macalintal asked.

He added: "Itanong nyo sa kanila (the New York Post) kung ano ang basis sa issue of immorality sapagkat marami naghihirap dito. Kung morality pinaguusapan ninyo, tignan din ninyo ang sarili nyo, sa mga infomercials na sinasabi nating labag sa batas. Kung labag yan, isoli ninyo, sabihin n'yo na 'nagkamali kami, napasama kami sa ilegal na transaksyon.' Ang ABS-CBN, ilang milyon ang kinita, halimbawa. (Why don't you ask the New York Post the basis for bringing up the issue of immorality, given there are many poor Filipinos. If we're talking about morality, you should take a look at yourselves, at the informercials you're running which could be violating the law. If they are in violation, then give back what you earned from airing them, say you made a mistake and was party to an illegal transaction. Take ABS-CBN for example, how much did it earn from the infomercials?)."

Different set of morals

But Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility Board of Trustee Vergel Santos said Macalintal should not be preaching about his own set of morals.

"He cannot impose their own morality and ethics among anybody else, including media. Sino ba ang may sabi na illegal ito, nadeclare na ba itong illegal? (Who said these infomercials were illegal?)," Santos said, also on ANC's Top Story.

"We are going to unnecessary details. Sinabi nya kailangan bang malaman ni Pres. Arroyo kung magkano gagastusin at kung ano kakainin. This government should be sensitive enough and prudent enough to know what they are getting into. (Macalintal said President Arroyo could not have known how much was going to be spent and what they would be eating.)," Santos added.

Santos also said it is perfectly reasonably to raise suspicions over the money spent for the President's New York dinner.

Press Secretary Cerge Remonde had said the bill was shouldered by Leyte Rep. Martin Romualdez, who has so far remained mum on the matter.

On Wednesday, the New York Post and the Washington Post both reported yet another expensive dinner the President and her entourage had, this time in Washington.

The U.S. newspapers reported that the meal at the Bobby Van's Steakhouse in the capital cost the party $15,000.

As of posting, the Palace, nor any member of Mrs. Arroyo's entourage had yet to comment on the report. - by Karen Caringal, ANC


Bookmark and Share

34 comments

This time tinamaan ng immorality ang media

The lawyer has a point this time. Okay the infomercials were not declared illegal that time but, come on, the viewers knew that these infomercials are being used as an early campaign for 2010. Kung yung viewers alam, eh di lalo na ang ABS-CBN at GMA-7.

Huwag na tayong maglokohan. Alam ninyo na mali ang ginagawa ng mga politikong yan and yet, hinahayaan ninyo KASI, MALAKI ANG BINABAYAD SA INYO. Nagdadahilan pa kayo eh halatang halata naman kayo. Hindi lang TV pati radyo meron din. Araw araw ko naririnig ang infomercials na yan. Kaya huwag na kayong umalma dahil MALI NAMAN TALAGA ANG GINAGAWA NINYO. Hindi puwedeng hindi ninyo alam dahil kung kaming mga viewers nga, napapailing na lang pag lumalabas sa TV ang mga infomercials na yan.

*** Ang pagsilbi sa bayan ay hindi dapat katamaran. Bayan dapat ang inuuna. Kalimutan muna ang pag-endorso sa kaibigan o pagbili ng mamahaling sasakyan. Nangako ka sa bayan. Tuparin mo. ***

Opinion ko

D2 sa abroad? kung magtext ka ng ISA,bayad ay katumbas ng ANIM NA PISO.
so kung ginamit mo yan sa pinas may anim na text ka.Hindi naman saka ka na lang magtext pag nandoon ka na.Mataas ang sweldo dito kumpara dyan pero mataas din ang bilihin , hindi pwede na di ka kumain dito.
ilan ba silang kumain don marami sila.banggitin nyo yun price per person
and ang cost of living. kung magkaparehas ang sweldo sa atin wala na mag aabroad para makapag ipon iuwi dyan sa pinas

Eh sino ngayon niloloko mga sarili nyo.


ang alam ko lang po...

I believe that the primordial duty of the media is to publish both sides of the story and let the public decide which is more credible. Yet, if the media's objective is to espouse an advocacy, they should publish it in it's editorial page or announce it in a political talk show but not place it as a banner story laden with leading and misleading questions to poison the mind of the public thereby encouraging divisiveness and upheaval.


ano daw...

Ano daw??? Bago yata ito a! If a medium of communication "HAS NO ISSUES OR ADVOCAY TO STAND ON", HOW COME IS IT SO DANGEROUS??? Paki-esplika lang po baka may matutunan ang mga nagbabasa.


on media

the presidents' defender's have all the rights to justify thier boss unethical act. the meal, a given fact that the arroyo's spend millions of peso (watch out the re-imbursement of those Congressman who claim they payed the meal) MUST NOT BE BROUGH TO PUBLIC is what the president's follower want to. though we all agree its unethical... ironic, isn't?

good thing we have some media institution, though they might be earning from gov't ads they wont let go of the PUBLILC INTEREST and the truth behind our gov't uncropulous practice.

the most dangerous media are those who are just playing safe... no issues & advocacy to stand on.

(-;

TO: Abogago Macalinta

Abogagong Macalinta huwag kang masyadong sipsip, sobra kang matalino hindi mo nararamdaman ang paghihirap ng sambayanang Pilipino, para kang makapili noong kapanahunan ng Hapon, Malinta ka talaga sarili mo lamang ang iyong iniisip isa kang abogagong bobo. Wala ka pang napalunang kaso puro panloloko sa kapwa mo Pilipino.

To: Madam MELDITA, Tama ka nagdidiwang ang mag asawang Gloria Macapal Ayoko sa kanilang anibersayo at ang ipinang bayad sa engrading salo salo ay ng galing sa iyong pamangkin na galing din sa nakaw. Katulad ng karamihang Pilipino na nag diriwang ng ani

The lawyer's right

3

It's shameful that ABS-CBN has allowed its coverage of Philippine news to be swayed and influenced by its owners, the Lopez family. The Lopezes running feuds with the Arroyos and Macapagals have led to unbalanced, biased reporting on the part of ABS-CBN. Down with all feudalism in the Philippines, including in the media sector!

It incenses me when Western media, trying to be polite, notes that the Philippines has a rabidly free press. What what useful purpose do Filipinos use their freedom of the press? Philippine news in general does not strive for objective coverage. Not only is it sensationalist, but worse, one cannot distinguish between the standard news articles and editorials. Most recently it has been absurd notions of Arroyo trying to cling to power by supporting a parliamentary system. a) The Philippines needs a parliamentary system to help encourage the development of real political parties, and the Senate is redundant--basically 24 egotistical mini Presidents. If Arroyo is so unpopular, she would not win election, and her party would not control Parliament; so scaremongering on the part of the media is nonsensical.

Shoddy, unprofessional, irresponsible reporting is one factor in the Philippines' poor economic and political development.


Romy macaLINTA

CJ Reynato Puno and the likes are the famed and "TRUE LEGAL LUMINARIES" while Romy macaLINTA and his gang are the infamous "LEGAL MERCERIES". Maraming nakakakilala sa sikat na sikat na pagkatao ni Romy Boy Atorni.

---------- Don't label me I am original! ----------

proof that you are confused Christoto...

CHRISTITOTO, I'LL SHOW TO YOU WHY YOU ARE CONFUSED AND MISGUIDED. I'LL QOUTE ONE OF YOUR STATEMENTS THUS, "Ibig mong sabihin na ang foreign news have the same integrity as the Philippines na puweding suhulan? I don’t think so." BASAHIN MO ULIT AT PAGISIPANG MABUTI. DI BA ANG MALIWANAG NA "CONCLUSION" SA SINABI MO AY ANG FOREIGN MEDIA AY DI NASUSUHULAN PERO ANG PHILIPPINE MEDIA AY NASUSUHULAN? YOU INADVERTENTLY CONFIRMED MY COMMENT, DI BA? SAAN KA BA TALAGA KAKAMPI?

KUNG BAKIT MISGUIDED KA? PAKIBASA NA LANG YONG COMMENT KO SA IBABA TUNGKOL SA NANGYARI SA US MEDIA NOONG NAKARAANG PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN NG MGA KANDIDATO PAGKA PRESIDENTE AT BISE PRESIDENTE NG AMERIKA. IT HAPPENED IN ALL MEDIA FRONTS (NEWSPAPER, RADIO, TV, AND INTERNET,) YOU CAN SEARCH THE INTERNET SO THAT YOU CAN BE GUIDED ACCORDINGLY.


erratum...

I mean CONCERNED CITIZEN and not ALFREDO. Sorry 'tol.