8 presidential bets engage youth in ANC forum

Posted at 01/30/2010 1:20 AM | Updated as of 02/04/2010 3:37 PM

Few fireworks in debate at DLSU

MANILA, Philippines - For the first time, eight of the country's presidential candidates gathered together in a presidential forum to convince the youth that they are fit to lead the country if elected president in the May 10 poll.

There were pointed jabs but few fireworks in the ANC Youth 2010 presidential forum at the De La Salle University campus on Taft Avenue, Manila as the eight presidential candidates laid down their platforms of government and tackled subjects such as the reproductive health bill, corruption, and the legacy of President Arroyo.

The eight who attended the event were former Defense Secretary Gilbert Teodoro, Sen. Benigno "Noynoy" Aquino III, Sen. Manny Villar, Sen. Richard Gordon, Sen. Jamby Madrigal, televangelist Eddie Villanueva, environmentalist Nick Perlas, and Olongapo councilor JC delos Reyes.

In an interview on ANC after the forum, Prof. Edna Co of the University of the Philippines National College of Public Administration and Governance (NCPAG) praised Gordon, Aquino and Madrigal for making a clear impact on the audience during the forum.

Audience members, on the other hand, said it was Teodoro, Gordon and Aquino who made a favorable impression during the event.

Co praised Gordon for being a good communicator and giving straightforward answers to all of the questions. "He was speaking from a very clear position on what his views are on most of the issues," she said.

She also gave plus points to Aquino for his improved performance but noted that the Liberal Party senator should articulate his positions better instead of issuing "motherhood statements."

"He didn't waver as much as in previous forums, but there is room for improvement," she said.

She said Madrigal came across as "strong, brave and clearly ideological" considering that it was her first time to attend a presidential forum.

"She had strong criticism coming from a neoliberal position, and whether you agree with her or not, she had very categorical answers for the questions," she said.

Finally, she said the audience missed former President Joseph Estrada who skipped the forum since he had to shoot a campaign ad.

"The audience missed him. It would have been good for him to face this kind of forum. He could have added to the luster of the discussion," she said.

C-5 controversy

During the forum, Madrigal made pointed asides at Villar over the latter's alleged budget insertions in the C-5 road extension project.

“Hinahamon ko ang mayayaman na senators na ilabas sa website and lahat ng insertions na nakabuti sa businesses nila. [I  challenge my fellow rich senators to reveal on a website all the budget insertions that favored his businesses.]” Madrigal said.

In response, Villar said he had already answered the controversy numerous times and had placed his answers in his website.

Asked why she was lagging in the presidential surveys, Madrigal said she did not believe them since some presidential candidates could influence the results.

Co said the brief back-and-forth between Madrigal and Villar over the C-5 issue was held back by time constraints. She said, however, that Villar lost points when he threw the issue back at Madrigal and told her to read his website.

"In a way, he was brushing it aside. Most in the public would have wanted him to answer," she said.

TV ads

During the forum, Villar leveled his own aside against presidential frontrunner Aquino as a way of defending his expenses on TV ads.

Villar said he is amenable to a proposal to limit campaign spending but noted that infomercials were a way to level the playing field against the more popular candidates.

"In limiting campaign spending, we should not shut the door to those candidates who are poor, whose mother was not a celebrity, whose sibling was not a celebrity, so that they can be known...Even though I have a lot of infomercials, I don't think I can reach the level of popularity of a popular celebrity or a popular mother," he said in an apparent jab against Aquino. Aquino's mother is the late president Corazon Aquino while his sister is popular TV host Kris Aquino.

Asked about his advice to candidates who had no money, he said: "It depends on what you do. For example, in business, if you have no money, it's probably because you don't know how to manage. You will be giving a big problem to the country if you run when you can't even manage your business."

Gordon, however, said the people should not be afraid of rich candidates. "Kahit mayaman ang kalaban, wag matakot!" he said.

He also vowed to give free Kindle e-book readers for public school students and raise the monthly salaries of public school teachers to P40,000 if elected president.

RH bill

Several candidates gave opposing views on the controversial reproductive health bill, which advocates sex education for primary and secondary school students.

Delos Reyes said he sees no need to support sex education since he believes the youth have "natural" or instinctive knowledge of sex.

"Palagay ko po ang isang kabataan, may sapat na natural na kaalaman kung ano ang mangyayari kung siya ay sumipi. (I think youth have enough natural knowledge of what will happen if they have sex)," he said.

He also said he believes distributing condoms to the youth, as part of safe-sex campaigns, "promotes promiscuity and infidelity."

Aquino, meanwhile, softened his stand for the RH bill and said he wants several amendments in the measure. 

“There are provisions that I cannot support,” Aquino said. “I was mistakenly labeled as co-author [of the bill]. Actually, I’m listed as interpellator, and I’m waiting for my opportunity."

“But having said that, I still think that this is a problem that we cannot bury our heads in the sand. Kailangan natin tugunan. Habang hindi inaasikaso ang problema, tuloy lalaki ang problem at tuloy ang pasakit sa taongbayan,” he added.

Should Arroyo face charges?

All but one of the candidates agreed that President Arroyo should face charges for various misdeeds during her term including alleged massive cheating in the 2004 elections and large kickbacks from the NBN-ZTE and fertilizer fund scams.

Villanueva blamed the Arroyo administration for gross misgovernance and said the rule of law must be applied on those who have done wrong.

“Bigyan natin ng katarungan ang ating taong bayan (Let us give justice to our people),” he said. “No man should be above the law."

Perlas said Arroyo should be made to answer for the Northrail, Southrail and ZTE-NBN scandals. "What are the geo-political imperatives behind the ZTE, Northrail, Southrail and the investments of the Chinese in the mining industry? She opened up the country for long-term lease to foreigners even while issues of agrarian reform and ancestral domain of lumads and Muslims remain pending," he said.

Reyes, on the other hand, went one step further and said corrupt government officials from the time of the Marcos dictatorship should be made to account for their actions.

For his part, Teodoro said anyone could file a case against the President as long as they have the evidence to convict her of a crime. "If I help pursue a case against her, people would think I was participating in a whitewash. If I don't join, they would say I am not doing my job," he said.

He added: "Mt principle here is anyone can file a case...I will not interfere. Let justice be done."

Co said the question on Arroyo's accountability was particularly telling since the next president would have to deal with the past president before he or she could move forward.

"It's one of the issues that some sectors of society will put before you and will haunt the next administration," she said.

She noted that Teodoro was put on the spot by the question, especially since he is the administration's bet in the election. "I think Teodoro was put on a tight situation. He was trying to be safe on certain issues such as Gloria Arroyo. He even wavered on the RH bill," she said.

Co said presidential forums allow the public to know the candidate but may have a limited effect on the popularity surveys. She added some of the candidates should learn how to be an effective speaker during public forums.

"It's not just what ideas you carry but how you put across the message. Sometimes you have quite a lot there but the communication and the way you put it across is not effective so you are subjected to different levels of appreciation by the audience," she said.


Bookmark and Share

51 comments

Manalo, matalo. May paninindigan ang boto ko! Gordon 2010!!!

5

Angelo: Iboboto ko si Noynoy, dahil magaling kumanta si Regine Velasquez at Sharon Cuneta

Alfred: Iboboto ko si Villar, dahil nakakatawa si Dolphy at Willie Revillame

Jasmin: Iboboto ko si Erap, dahil paborito ng nanay ko si Lorna Tolentino

Michael: Iboboto ko si Gibo, dahil astig na banda ang Rivermaya

Ariel: Iboboto ko si Bro. Eddie, dahil idol na idol kong humataw si Gary V.

AKO AT ANG MILYON-MILYONG PILIPINO NA NAG-AASAM NG TUNAY NA PAGBABAGO:
Iboboto namin si Gordon dahil tinuro nya ang Disiplina sa mga
taga-Olongapo. Nagpasok sya ng libo-libong trabaho para sa mga taga-SBMA.
Maraming tinulongang mga biktima ng sakuna bilang Chairman ng Red Cross.
Nagpapasok ng maraming turista sa Pilipinas dahil sa kanyang programang
WOW Philippines nung sya ay Secretary of Tourism. Maraming batas na
isinulat tulad ng Automation Law, Veteran's Bill at Tourism Law habang
Chairman ng Senate Blue Ribbon Committee.

Ikaw, ano ang batayan mo sa pagboto....?


Nothing new...

If we have an election everyday or every week, then perhaps something good can come out. 3yrs is a long time for these crooks suck this country dry.

Please, lets find a way to make these politicians accountable to the country to its people instead of only every 3 yrs.


Kanino ba masasayang ang Boto?

Sinasabi nyong masasayang ang boto nyo kapag ang iboboto nyo ay hindi pinapasikat sa surveys?

Saan ba talaga masasayang ang boto? Sa bumoto ng sikat at liamado o sa bumoto ng talagang karapat dapat?

6 na taon nating papasanin ang pagkakamali sa pagboto, tulad ng pagboto kina erap at gloria.. Nagsisisi daw ang mga pilipino ngunit kung titingnan mo ang mga nangungunang mga kandidato, may pinagkaiba ba sa mga dati ng mga binoto nyo?

By many reasons, kay Gordon ako.. Manalo o matalo, wala akong pakialam, basta alam kong tama ang iboboto ko at kung iba man ang manalo, kung between money or kumunoy ay libre naman uling magsisi ang mga Pilipino..

VILLAR & d' contractors inc; may mababago pa ba? NOYNOY & kamaganak inc; welcome back sa kaban ng bayan ERAP & d' gambling lords inc; parang awa na GIBO & pandak inc; I want to become d'1st PM Ang sayasaya GORDON & d volunteers inc; Pag-unlad

OFWs for Gordon

Dito sa Singapore, kay daming nagwowork sa bahay, mostly from northern luzon, mga tapos ng teaching sa pinas, ibig sabihin ay tapos ng kolehiyo, nagtityagang magpaalila dito. Iyan ang suliranin ng pinas, salat sa hanapbuhay, meron man ay salat ding pangtustos sa pang-araw araw na gastusin.

Mga OFW, magkaisa tayo para kay gordon.. Siya ang subok na pong may kakayahang magbigay ng hanapbuhay.. May pag-asa tayong makauwi na kasama ang mga mahal sa buhay.. si gordon lang ang may kakayahan.. Hindi tatamad tamad, hindi lalamya lamya. Bawal ang tamad na pangulo.. Huwag na tayong makipagsapalaran sa walang nagawa..

Sinasabi sa surveys na masasayang daw ang boto pag sa mga kulelat sa surveys ang iboboto.. Magpapaimpluwensiya ba tayo sa mga huwad na surveys? Kung totoo man ay iilan lang ba ang nasurvey nila vs sa dami ng botante?

Saan ba talaga masasayang ang boto, sa bumoto ng tama o sa boboto ng hindi naman karapat dapat, sikat lang? Pinoy, 6 years po itong tatahakin natin, sana po ay bumoto ng mas karapat dapat at huwag magpaimpluwensiya sa surveys, lalo tayong mga OFW, magkaisa po tayo, dahil tayo nalang halos ang sumasagip sa hilagpos na pinas, kaya sana po ay magkaisang si Gordon ang suportahan, paniguradong may magandang ibibigay sa ating mga pilipino.

VILLAR & d' contractors inc; may mababago pa ba? NOYNOY & kamaganak inc; welcome back sa kaban ng bayan ERAP & d' gambling lords inc; parang awa na GIBO & pandak inc; I want to become d'1st PM Ang sayasaya GORDON & d volunteers inc; Pag-unlad

To Filicrab

5

Nabasa ko yung more than one hour privilege speech ni Manny Villar na pagkatapos he ran away, avoiding and not giving a chance to his colleagues to interpellate him who were attentively listening to him for more than one hour. His action is a blatant display of his ARROGANCE. Is this the kind of President that we are going to have? Why can't Manny Villar directly answer the questions/interpellation in front of his colleagues rather than go to the media via press conference? Certainly he was ill advised by his choo-choo train lawyers. It would have been much much better for him if he did not deliver his useless privilege speech. His running away is tantamount to admission of guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Just like Erap Estrada, Manny Villar will land in jail someday.


Overpricing!

Maganda naman sana ang idinidulot ng C-5 project na yan pero ang POINT dito ay ang OVERPRICING na issue.
Kasi, yong ibang nagmay-ari ng lupa ay binayaran ng mababang halaga kompara sa naibayad kay Villar.

Lalo na senador at naging Senate President ang nagmay-ari syempre hindi mawala sa mata ng mga tao na dapat bantayan kung nasa tamang proseso ang proyekto na ito.
Kasi, tayo ang TAXPAYERS! Dapat mapagmatyag tayo kung ang ibinabayad natin hindi naibulsa ng ilang mga pulitiko.

God bless Philippines!

Oks na oks

to bantaygob

Nabasa ko link na yan, parang totoo makumbinsi ka sa una.

Pero basahin mo rin latest PRIVELEGDE SPEECH NI VILLAR search mo na lang.

Dalawa talaga yun road na yan magkatabi pero magkaibang project, yun isa TOLL ROAD isa lang exit . Yun isa naman service road so maraming opening yan, open ba,yun di makabayad ng Toll.

Sa makatuwid Parang SLEX sa kabilaan may service road.

So expressway 2, deretso sa NLEX,

Thanks for the road. it will create business activity definitely not be mothballed.


C-5 Controversy

5

I invite you to visit this link:

http://www.gmanews.tv/story/182541/the-c5-extension-controversy-an-inter...

This is the link taken from www.gmanews.tv, so we cannot say that abs-cbn-news reporting is biased against Manny Villar. There are other ends and links that we will know who is Manny Villar. From this link you will see the interactive map of the C-5 Extension Project, where the controversy arose. To view the maps, just click the arrow-head below the map and the explanation goes as follows:

First Map: Road in Orange color is the 1986 C-5 Road, in which the broken lines in Orange color are the proposed C-5 Road Extension for both North and South bounds as announced by GMA in 2007.

Second Map: Road in Green color is the Original Plan of C-5 Road Extension (South Bound), known as the Manila-Cavite Toll Express Way Project or MCTEP.

Third Map: Road in Orange color, is the Constructed Existing or As-built of C-5 Road Extension (South Bound), in which the greater length and proximity to properties developed by companies linked to Manny Villar.

Observation: It can be clearly observed that the Third Map which shows the Constructed Existing or As-built of C-5 Road Extension (South Bound) has been diverted/realigned from the Second Map which is the Original Plan of C-5 Road Extension (South Bound), known as the Manila-Cavite Toll Express Way Project or MCTEP. The Senate majority report has reasons to believe that Manny Villar and his family benefited this unethical and illegal project.

Now you will be convinced not to vote for Manny (Mnoney) Villar.


Against Noynoy, Villar and Gibo!

5

RIGHT now, I am still undecided as to who I’m going to vote for president. But here are my thoughts on three of the candidates.

On Noynoy Aquino: I still don’t buy the “passing of the torch” idea. Even if he is the son of democracy icons, it doesn’t mean he will continue what they fought for, or that he is the most qualified to be the next president.

Noynoy keeps on saying that he is not the type who brags about his accomplishments. But the fact is he has no major accomplishment to speak of. He has not penned a single piece of good legislation in all his years in the Senate and in the House of Representatives. If he did not fully carry out his responsibilities as a legislator, what guarantee do we have that he is going to carry out his responsibilities as a president?

On Manny Villar: He is a very successful businessman. He has made a name for himself. However, I don’t see why he cannot continue serving the country as a businessman. After all, in that capacity, he is already doing our country a lot of good by providing thousands of Filipinos employment. Second, I don’t see how he, as president and a major stakeholder in many businesses, can completely avoid a conflict of interest. What would he do if the best interest of the country would not be good for his business ventures?

The Senate report on the C-5 extension controversy heightens the doubts about his integrity. I’m not saying he is guilty. All I’m saying is that it’s not doing him any good with undecided voters.

I think he is a brilliant candidate for rallying the poor to his side. But I have to point out that this strategy is turning off many voters, even the poor ones. Why? Because it is insensitive and suffers from a dearth of logic. Being born to a well-off family doesn’t mean you are incapable of empathizing with the poor.

Besides, Villar is just “feeding” us what we’ve getting from traditional politicians. Instead of using “promises,” he uses “vision.” His vision looks good, but not his plan. What is he going to do with the housing problem or with the OFWs’ travails? Is he going to give each and every one of us a house like what he has done for a few “Wowowee” contestants? Would he just continue to fetch abused OFWs from other countries like what his infomercials show?

On Gibo Teodoro: He refused to criticize President Macapagal-Arroyo despite the corruption scandals that plagued her administration. A very smart man, he doesn’t seem to get it—it is no longer just about loyalty, it is about right or wrong. If he does not have the moral spine to stand up against what is clearly wrong, I don’t know how he can convince us that he is the right man for the job.

In a presidential debate, he said that he headed what he claimed to be one of the cleanest government agencies—the Department of National Defense. Unfortunately, after the Ampatuan massacre and the caches of firearms found in Maguindanao, this claim won’t wash.

—CARLO M. DANGCALAN,


link

guys,..

try to visit the link below,..

http://www.manilastandardtoday.com/insideNation.htm?f=2010/february/1/na...

sana naman mag publish ang ABS sa resulta ng botohan after the debate,..

stp


Links