Prosecutor admits complaint vs Corona poorly crafted

Posted at 02/07/2012 6:13 PM | Updated as of 02/08/2012 6:47 AM

MANILA, Philippines (UPDATE) - Ilocos Norte Rep. Rodolfo Fariñas on Tuesday provided some unexpected comic relief in the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona when he said the impeachment complaint was poorly crafted.

Fariñas made the remark after Senate President and Presiding Judge Juan Ponce Enrile asked the prosecution the relevance of an allegation in the article questioning the “competence, integrity, probity and independence” of Chief Justice Corona.

The prosecution introduced on the 13th day of trial Article 3 of its complaint, which reads in full: “respondent committed culpable violations of the constitution and betrayed the public trust by failing to meet and observe the stringent standards under art. viii, section 7 (3) of the constitution that provides that ‘[a] member of the judiciary must be a person of proven competence, integrity, probity, and independence…’”

Enrile, however, noted that nowhere in the article that the prosecution indicated that Corona allegedly “dipped his hands into public funds to finance personal expenses.”

It was prosecutor Rodolfo Fariñas who answered, saying this particular issue is an integral part of the whole article.

He said Corona himself has already denied the issue “and we should be given our chance to debate that.”

The parties have yet to conclude article 2, which discusses the truthfulness of Corona’s statement of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN).

The senator-judges disallowed prosecutors from submitting evidence on paragraph 2.4 of the Second Article of Impeachment while allowing the entry of evidence for paragraphs 2.2 and 2.3.

Senator-judges decided to drop article 2.4 of the complaint, or the alleged ill-gotten wealth of Corona, which had been the rallying cry of the prosecution in their effort to seek a conviction for betrayal of public trust and culpable violation of the Constitution.

This time, however, the debate on the inclusion of the “dipping of his hands in public funds” provided a relief of sorts to the seriousness of the trial.

Enrile engaged Fariñas in a debate over the matter, which led even to the former’s roles as Senate President and senator.

They were discussing the possible “conviction” of Corona.

Enrile asked if the proceedings were criminal in nature, since Fariñas was pointing out that the prosecution wanted to convict Corona.

“It’s just like this, if the senators say you can no longer be a Senate President, tapos na ang araw niyo,” Fariñas said.

Enrile then answered “but I am still a senator…My being a senator is not hinged on my being a Senate President.”

Poorly crafted

The debate went on for a few minutes, until senator-judge Jinggoy Estrada took the floor.

He asked why Fariñas was still prosecutor even if he did not sign the complaint.

The latter answered he was not a fast reader, unlike his 188 colleagues who were able to sign the complaint.

He added he did not include anymore his signature because there were already a lot of complainants.

But what further led to guffaws in the session hall was his answer: “At masama po ang pagkakagawa ng complaint, inaamin ko naman po.”

Fariñas later clarified his statement before reporters.

The lawmaker said he did not mean that the impeachment complaint was badly written. He said the House was afraid the Supreme Court will stop the Corona impeachment had they not filed it the way they did.

He cited the injunctions issued to the impeachment cases against Chief Justice Hilario Davide and then Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez.

Fariñas said that while he didn’t sign the complaint because he had not read it at that time, he believes in the grounds for impeachment and its cause.

FASAP

Earlier in the day, the prosecution presented a volunteer witness, Flight Attendants and Stewards Association of the Philippines President Roberto “Bob” Anduiza. He said they want Corona out because they have already lost trust in the justice system.

He alleged Corona may have used his influence in the case concerning the retrenchment of the PAL flight attendants. With a report from RG Cruz, ABS-CBN News


Bookmark and Share

7 comments

a little over 20 million sans the mansion being built

par. 2.1 of art. 2 alleges that the CJ failed to declare his SALN. after a partial sen-judge have successfully extracted the SALN of corona, it proved that the CJ regularly files his SALN. because of this, bargaza informed the impeachment court that the prosecution is abandoning the charge of non-disclosure of SALN. a clear victory for the defense.

the prosecution camp alleges that corona's SALN have discrepancies. that is yet to be proven by the prosecution. and even if that is the case for the sake of an arguement, the law allows amendments in SALN. having said that, no law has been violated contrary to what the prosecution is trying to portray.

lastly, the bank records of corona is not part of the impeachment complaint. the prosecution failed to justify the relevance of corona's bank account in the charges leveled against him. the bank records that is in the possession of tupas jr. was acquired illegally and should not be used against the defendant.

literally, the prosecution is into fishing expedition since they do not have evidence on hand. the impeachment court will need to subpoena the banks so the prosecution can fish for information against the CJ. this govt. is violating the constitutional right of the accuse using means fair and foul to persecute CJ.

On NEILTUPAS JR. 50 MILLION MANSION

even the quezon city assessor interviewed last night undauntedly claim that neil tupaz jr. is lying to his teeth when he claimed that his mansion is only 14.5 million.

according to credible media sources, the purchase price for the lot alone could go a little over 20 million sans the mansion being built.

when you point a finger, your other three fingers could be pointing back at you ...


The prosecutors do not have

The prosecutors do not have to admit that their impeachment complaint is poorly crafted, it is plain to see for the public that the prosecution team is a fiasco. Marami pang kakaining bigas si Tupas compared to Cuevas who studies his assignment diligently.


▼▼▼ LEAKED BANK DOCUMENTS ▼▼▼

Extreme loads of Money in bank accounts
that might even surpass
the wealth accumulated by Pacquiao

http://vwv pinakasikat com/BankDocument


THEY MISCALCULATED KALA ACCEPTED AGAD NG TAO

TOOONGRESSMANNN with PNOY instruction miscalculated ,, kala kc accepted agad ng madlang tao kht fabricated evidence. Ngayon agawan sa candy C TUPAZ and FARINAS parang mga bata tinulak c TUPAK.. ako namann mag bibida LOL
LAHAT GAGAWIN ni PNOY to impeach CORONA, on June lalabas finality SC decision of HACIENDA LUISITA distribution, pinasauli pa 1.3 Billion pa sa magsasaka,,,, mahal ni PNOY c LUISITA 10Billion SALAPI bayaran ni Juan de la Cruz.

KUNG WALANG CJ-CORONA MERONG HACIENDA LUISITA…. Kakawang magsasaka pinatulongan ng yellowmobs
It only shows how GREEDYtard the COAJANGCO-AQUINO , the most Greedytard clan in entire country.


may backbone

at least may backbone si Farinas na umamin, I like to see him against Miriam parehong matigas sila, baka maatake si Miriam

epong

ha hahaha hahahhahaah

nakakatawa ang mga prosecution team.

Itigil nyo na para iwas gastos sa kaban ng bayan.


walang kwenta

mabuti naman inamin ng prosecutor na napakahina talaga ng bintang nila kay corona.

hindi lamang yon, dahil sa 1-day processing ay hindi nila pinag-isipan ng mabuti ang lahat. ganyan talaga ang nangyayari kung bugso lamang ng damdamin ni noynoy ang lahat dahil sa hacienda luisita.

sayang na sayang ang pera ng taong bayan na halos malustay ng walang saysay upang pagbigyan lamang ang alburoto ng isang noynoy aquino. napaka gastos naman ng sumpong o paltik ni noynoy aquino.