MATINDI TALAGA ITONG SI BAKLETANG ABNOY PNOY..HINDI LANG PALA ITO MADATONG SA MGA MACHO...MADATONG RIN PALA ITO SA MGA SENATOR JUDGES...BWA HAHAHAHA..

PATI SI GRACE LEE, GINAMIT PA NIYA AT GINAWANG SMALL LADY SA PROSECUTION.

HAHAHA...ITO NAMAN SI GRACE LEE NAGPAGAMIT KAY BAKLETANG ABNOY PNOY PARA GAWING PANAKIP BUTAS SA KABAKLAAN NITO.

MABUHAY SI CHIEF JUSTICE CORONA..THE MODERN PHILIPPINE HERO AND THE DEFENDER OF BILL OF RIGHTS.

IBAGSAK SI BAKLETANG ABNOY PNOY AT IBIGAY NA SA MGA PARU PARO....IBAGSAK ANG NAAABNOY NG GOVERNMENT NI BAKLETANG ABNOY PNOY.

Cock and bull story - double whammy for the prosecution (is it real?)

instrumental for the issuance of the subpoena is the bank document submitted by the prosecution. the fake bank document is the sole reason why the senate impeachment court decided to issue a subpoena to the concerned banks. but what is the connection between the aforesaid fake bank document to the fabricated story of umali regarding her mystic little lady? isn't it intriguing?

here is the catch, it is "only" tupas and umali who signed the request for the impeachment court to issue a subpoena to the banks using the fake bank document. PS bank branch manager tiongson refused to deny or confirm that tupas is a valued depositor in their branch (PS bank katipunan). it doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that the only "way" to produce similar but false copy of the bank document of the CJ, is to have someone from the bank itself leak the document. it is ironic that tiongson refuses to confirm if tupas is a valued depositor in PS bank katipunan. the possibility of connivance is not a far fetch idea. tupas may have requested to leak the bank document of corona through tiongson. now, the prosecution needed to come up with a story to cover the crime. here comes umali to the rescue. as a result, umali came up with an impossible story about a little lady who he claims handed him the fake documents. this is ofcourse to cover the crime perpetrated by tupas. however, the problem is, umali is not at all good at lying. since he claim that the little lady handed him the document around 2:30 pm on his way out of the senate, he failed to realize that people from the senate can ask for a review of the CCTV. since the senate sergeant of arms did not see the little lady's apparition in the CCTV, it became obvious that umali is lying to his teeth.

but the worse thing about it is that, these prosecutors who are also lawyers, clearly violated Republic Act 1405 for using a document from an anonymous source. how can you exact accountability or determine the authenticity of such document if it came from an anonymous source? sen-judge miriam is so infuriated about this that caused her blood pressure to shoot up. clearly, what the prosecution did especially umali and tupas is a ground for disbarment.

second, the prosecution never took the time to determine the authenticity of such document. the law dictates that the foreign currency deposits (dollar account) cannot be disclosed unless with the consent of the depositor. given this law, the prosecutors should have refuse to present the document or even use it. since the document was produced without the consent of the depositor, the document is either fake or illegally acquired. if the document is illegally acquired, then it is a violation of the law specifically Republic Act 1405. these prosecutors / lawyers should know that.

the senate allowed the fake document to be used for the issuance of the subpoena without trying to verify or confirm the authenticity of such document. JPE said the impeachment court assumed that the document is authentic and was submitted in good faith by the prosecution. that for me is a lame excuse.

damage has been done to the accuse even without the opening of the dollar account. why did the senate allowed the issue of bank account of corona to be discuss when in fact the prosecution failed to prove the materiality and relevancy of the issue to the impeachment case that they filed against the CJ. apparently, the senate made a ruling that prohibits both the defense and prosecution to tackle par. 2.4 of article 2 since the articles of impeachment did not allege corona of amassing ill-gotten wealth. if the impeachment court is trying corona for an accusation (ill-gotten wealth) that he was never accused, then the senate impeachment court is in violation of their own ruling. thus, making the impeachment court a kangaroo court and a court open for fishing expedition!

paragraph 2.1 and 2.2 of art. 2 alleges the non-disclosure of CJ's SALN.
TRUTH: drilon manged to extract the SALN of CJ. because of this, the court confirmed that corona regularly files his SALN. thus, compelling the prosecutors to abandon the accusation of non-declaration of SALN.

paragraph 2.3 of art. 2: alleges that the CJ failed to declare some of his properties accurately in his SALN and that he committed perjury.
TRUTH: the law allows corrections in CJ's SALN. that being the case, no law has been violated not even perjury is applicable. additionally, perjury is not even an impeachable offense.

paragraph 2.4 of article 2: alleges that corona amassed ill-gotten wealth.
TRUTH: the senate itself made a ruling that par. 2.4 of art 2 will no longer be tackled since article 2 does not allege corona of amassing ill-gotten wealth. the prosecution is prohibited by the senate impeachment court to tackle par. 2.4 of art 2. the prosecution needed to cure art 2 or toss the impeachment complaint back to prostituted congress before they can touch the issue of ill-gotten wealth.

included in the articles of impeachment, CJ's failure to account on JDF.
TRUTH: COA cleared corona involving this accusation (2010 JDF) prior to the commencement of the trial.

the prosecution accused corona of having 45 properties.
TRUTH: during the impeachment trial, it was proven that the list of 45 properties is bloated.

Prosecution used bank documents to force the issuance of subpoena
TRUTH: the documents used by the prosecution were confirmed to be fake as stated by PS bank president gracia and branch manager tiongson. evidently, the documents used by the prosecution were acquired illegally.

umali said the documents used to subpoena corona's account were handed by a "little lady."
TRUTH: upon review of the CCTV, the little lady is missing. could it be an apparition?

Corona shedding tears is like Arroyo saying sorry on TV...... Corona accuses Malacañang of bribing the Senator-Judges is like Abalos accusing Judge Mupas of extortion.