Palace convinced CJ bank docs genuine
MANILA, Philippines - Malacañang is convinced that the questioned bank documents purportedly in the name of Chief Justice Renato Corona and presented by the House prosecution panel are genuine.
Presidential Spokesman Edwin Lacierda said the bank account numbers have been proven to be existing as allegedly shown in the testimony of Philippine Savings Bank President Pascual Garcia.
He said that if there are differences in the balance amount, it is something for the bank president and manager to reconcile.
“Ano ba ang fake? Fake ang account number e mayroong account number doon sa PSBank eh. Kung signature card, pirmado naman po ni Chief Justice Corona ‘yun. So I suppose they’re protecting their bank because there’s a violation of the Bank Secrecy Law so I would assume that the bank will do everything to protect itself from liability from the Bank Secrecy Law. But what has been proven is that it is not fake insofar as the account numbers, insofar as the figures are there,” Lacierda said.
Lacierda questioned PSBank branch manager Anabelle Tiongson’s inference in her testimony yesterday that the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas has previously taken a look at the bank records.
“Nililihis. Pinapasa sa BSP. It was a very slight but a very sly accusation on the BSP,” he said.
Prosecutors earlier presented as evidence some bank records they supposedly got from an anonymous source.
During Monday's hearing, Tiongson testified that a document on Corona's alleged dollar account submitted by the prosecution is "fake."
"Yes sir, they're fake documents," Tiongson said. "Yes sir. These did not come from our bank."
Tiongson's statements prompted Senate President and Presiding officer Juan Ponce Enrile to order prosecutors to explain in 24 hours why they presented the documents to the impeachment court.
Printer-friendly version
Send to friend
Share your views
The bottom line
Bottom line Mr. Lacierda, you said that the "LEAKED" bank statements were indeed authentic. Obviously you are very sure about your allegation considering that a person "as intellectual. learned and esteemed" as you would go on the record and allow yourself to be quoted on said statement. Nobody in his right mind would allow himself the disgrace "na makuryente" with the statements he delivers in front of the press and I assume you're not one of them. And I will further assume that you have SOLID PROOF to back up your claim. So here's the thing, in the interest of justice and upholding your boss' "matuwid na daan" battlecry, put your money where your mouth is and testify as to the authenticity of the bank statements that the Prosecution presented to the Impeachment Court. I would like to believe that you are man enough to have the "cojones" to call the Defense's dare. Being a man of my word, if you testify and prove that they are indeed authentic in open court, I will run naked all over town as penance and flagellate myself with barbed wire for one whole week! You can even do the whipping if you want. I won't mind. Call?
the mystic little lady
PS Bank Katipunan branch manager tiongson confirmed that the bank documents used by the prosecution to subpoena the bank accounts of corona were fake. if indeed the president of PS bank and manager tiongson are correct in saying that the prosecution used fake documents to force the issuance of subpoena, it is a shame that the senate allowed itself to be used and abused by the prosecution camp.
c...orona's bank accounts are out in the open because the senate issued a subpoena to the banks using the fake documents handed by the little lady to the prosecution people as the basis. shame to the impeachment court. this impeachment turned out to be a venue for fishing expedition, wherein legal and constitutional rights of the accuse are not being respected.
umali said that an anonymous little lady handed him the fake documents right inside the senate at around 2:30 pm while on his way out of the senate. however, according to the report of the senate sergeant of arms, the CCTV did not have a recording of the mystic little lady.
is the little lady an apparition? is that the reason why the CCTV footage failed to record her presence? does it mean that congressman umali has a third eye? wow, isn't creepy?
or is this investigation of senate sergeant of arms a confirmation of a lie peddled by the prosecution. was these fake documents a result of devine intervention that umali can't give any sound and plausible reasons? or is it a result of devine manipulation, falsification and relentless persecution?
@i_am_pluma_
INSTEAD OF CRACKING YOUR ROTTEN HEAD, JUST READ THIS BLOG BY CANDYMINT AND REPLY TO IT. PERIOD.
by Candymint on Tue, 02/14/2012 - 03:08
Liar, liar go to hell Thief Justice Corona. Here you go...
http://www.propinoy.net/2012/02/06/mr-corona-prove-that-you-have-nothing...
BETRAYAL OF PUBLIC, ESTE, MARITAL TRUST
Chief Justice Renato Corona wants to project the image that he is a loving husband to his wife, Cristina. The fact is, the Chief Justice has not only betrayed the public trust but most importantly, has betrayed his marital vow.
If the Chief Justice is man enough, He should admit the fact that he has a long-standing romantic relationship with a gentle lady named EVA with whom the Chief Justice has two (2) illegitimate sons. EVA also hails from Batangas and had her education from Assumption College just like his wife Cristina who also graduated earlier from the same school.
For Chief Justice Renato C. Corona not to mention his children with EVA as if they do not exist at all, is the highest form of ignominy and immorality that he can commit not only against his legitimate wife and family but against his oath as the highest magistrate of the land.
An inquiry into his relationship with EVA and his illegitimate children in connection with the on-going impeachment trial becomes extremely necessary in the light of the properties given by the Chief Justice to them. EVA, who has previously undergone a heart bypass operation, is known not to have worked from the time she had this romantic liaison with the Chief Justice nor does she have any known business of her own and yet, EVA is luxuriously living in the United States, together with her two (2) illegitimate children with the good Chief Justice.
The SALN of CJ Corona does not indicate any such properties.
And the reason for the frequent trips of CJ Corona to the United States, the latest of which was late last year, was to visit EVA and his children with her. That CJ Corona could afford to support the kind of luxurious lifestyle of EVA and her children in the U.S. is certainly for the Chief Justice to explain considering his small salary.
A simple investigation on the identity and circumstances of EVA can easily be done by a simple inquisition in Batangas as well as from the classmates, relatives and friends of EVA and of CJ Corona.
I know these facts because EVA is a relative of mine and it pains me immensely to see the Chief Justice professing his love for Cristina on nationwide television when he has confessed to my relative that he loves her far more than his wife. In fact, the Chief Justice made EVA believe that he was already separated from his wife Cristina. This probably explains why for the longest time, the Chief Justice has not reported in his SALN the fact of Cristina's working in government and the fact that Cristina has not signed the SALNs as his wife.
Betrayal of public trust? This is a small matter than what the Chief Justice has done to his wife and family which constitutes the highest form of immoral act - BETRAYAL OF MARITAL TRUST.
Real name of CJ Corona's girlfriend - Eva Auria; She hails from Rosario, Batangas; She graduated from Assumption College (not from Maryknoll College) She has two (2) sons with CJ Corona who are now in their teens; She is residing now in the United States. CJ Corona's wife, Cristina, knows about the elicit relationship of her husband with Eva. To know more about the details on Eva, a simple investigation of Eva's background in Rosario Batangas and Assumption College would elicit the necessary informations. Eva has plenty of properties in the US. They keep secret the exact address. The bagman of CJ Corona (who facilitates the transfer of funds from Corona to Eva is "Abet" who is a relative by affinity of Eva, being married to a stepsister of Eva. (The wife of Abet has the same mother as Eva but different Fathers). The biggest delivery to Eva involves the bribe money given by the Aguirres of Banco Filipino.
If the bank accounts of CJ Corona and his wife are opened, it will not be a surprise to see a running balance of not less than P200M. The bribe from the owner of the previously closed alone was a whopping P200M. And most money went to Eva through the Assistance of Abet.
The sons of Corona carry the name of the mother. But CJ Corona has openly recognized Ate Eva's sons as his. A simple search at the NSO using "Renato C. Corona" would readily reveal this. For a time, when Eva was still in the Philippines, Renato and Eva lived as husband and wife. In fact, all our relatives in Rosario, Batangas and in the United States, knew the long-standing relationship. We all thought that Renato was already separated from Cristina. Some of Renato's relatives in Tanuan, Batangas where he hailed from, know about this relationship. Some friends of Renato have seen the 2 sons and have been their ninongs. All our relatives thought really that Renato will never deny his relationship with Ate Eva. Sana hindi nya gagawin iyon kasi kawawa sya at ang mga bata.
@Maria4 - -My two cents worth
What are your intentions in posting this blog anyway? Better yet, answer this first: Do you even know what are impeachable offenses?
For the sake of argument, CJ did have an affair and father 2 sons with this EVA? So? Does this constitute and impeachable offense? Marcos did it with Dovie Beams and a number of other women. Ramos allegedly had Baby Arenas. Erap? Let's not even go there! I'll run out of space. Heck, even Binay admitted to having an affair! So? How come nobody raised even an eyebrow and filed an impeachment case on these people based on the grounds you now are posting?
Furthermore, if it is true, at least he still was man enough to support the woman and his sons. Not like some men or politicians I know.
So ask yourself again: What REALLY are your intentions in posting this blog? To impeach or besmirch?