More bishops back JC for president
CBCP chief warns clergy vs partisan politics
MANILA, Philippines - While other presidential candidates tap celebrities to boost their campaigns, one of their rivals scored a coup of sorts after getting the endorsement of 6 Catholic bishops without really trying.
John Carlos 'JC' delos Reyes, standard-bearer of Ang Kapatiran Party, has been described by the bishops as “the conscience vote for 2010.” (Read: Profile: John Carlos 'JC' de los Reyes / JC de los Reyes' first 100 days if elected)
Lipa Archbishop Ramon Arguelles said the entry into the race of Delos Reyes and Ang Kapatiran Party, whose platform of government hews closely to Christian doctrine and principles, might provide the trigger for political change. (Read: JC de los Reyes: Sex know-how for youth is instinctive)
“They are the only candidates who speak their mind, speak what is truthful and what is honest and idealistic,” he added.
Arguelles was the second prelate to express support for Delos Reyes, following the lead of Bacolod Bishop Vicente Navarra. Others who followed suit were Novaliches Bishop Antonio Tobias, San Jose de Mindoro Bishop Antonio Palang, Ilagan Bishop Joseph Nacua, and retired Bishop Teodoro Bacani. (Read: 3rd bishop to support Ang Kapatiran's JC)
Their vocal support for Delos Reyes’s campaign is unparalleled in the history of the local Catholic Church. (Read: 2 bishops quit PPCRV, endorse JC)
Tradition
Since it was founded in 1945, the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) has not endorsed any national or local candidates. The extent of their political participation during elections is to issue a checklist that serves as guide for voters, as well as identify issues that candidates should address.
Even during the regime of dictator Ferdinand Marcos, the CBCP refused to endorse his rival, Corazon Aquino, although the bishops would later on condemn the alleged massive cheating in the 1986 snap presidential election.
Perhaps only 2 prelates in recent memory had openly come out to endorse a candidate, says Arguelles. Former Manila Archbishop Cardinal Rufino Santos endorsed Diosdado Macapagal, who later won as President. Another Manila archbishop, Cardinal Jaime Sin, favored House Speaker Ramon Mitra in 1992, but later admitted that he voted for the one who won, Fidel Ramos.
The CBCP as an organization, however, maintains that it is only politically involved, but not partisan.
Changing mindset?
But Arguelles said that the May 2010 election “is an exceptional matter” that necessitates an exceptional response. “Haven’t we had had enough of corruption, of ambivalence, of these traditional politicians?” he asked.
“For the longest time, we’ve been stuck with the same people and individuals. Now we have choice,” Arguelles said.
When he and Navarra came out in support of Delos Reyes, Arguelles had hoped that others would follow suit. And 4 more did.
Is there a growing mindset among the bishops to cross the line from just issuing poll guidelines to officially endorsing a candidate?
Former CBCP president and retired archbishop Oscar Cruz explained that the CBCP’s position not to endorse a candidate is not cast in stone.
He said under the Church law and under the Constitution, prelates do not violate anything when they endorse a candidate.
But the prohibition, he said, applies when the clergy and the bishops assume civil positions.
Still, the CBCP believes it would be more prudent not to endorse any particular candidate to “avoid dividing the flock,” Cruz said.
Some of the candidates and their supporters are Catholics and supporting one over the other “could send the wrong signal that Catholics are divided.” Besides, “Catholics have their own views, exercising free will,” he said.
Cruz said that the open support of the 6 bishops for Delos Reyes does not mean that the CBCP as an institution is backing Delos Reyes. He doubts that the CBCP would break its rule to be non-partisan in the very near future.
Weak leadership
However, a Church leader who requested not to be named, believes that move of the 6 bishops is a symptom of the weak leadership in the CBCP under Tandag Archbishop Nereo Odchimar.
“Breaking tradition on non-partisanship is a no-no to us before. You cannot just go out there and endorse a candidate,” the Church leader said.
Odchimar became CBCP president with the backing of the bishops identified with President Arroyo. (Read: Palace bet is new CBCP president)
After the 6 bishops declared support for Delos Reyes, Odchimar issued a pastoral statement in his diocese in Tandag, Surigao de Sur, warning the clergy against engaging in partisan politics.
Bishops who are identified with Mrs. Arroyo prevailed on him to issue the statement. The impression now is that Odchimar would act at Malacañang’s bidding.
Arguelles said that he is not bound by Odchimar’s reminder that Church officials should keep out of partisan politics. (abs-cbnNews.com/Newsbreak)







Go JC...
Now that he's introduced to Filipinos and endorsed by CBCP, there's one person we can now rally behind to support in the future so that we will have more people in government with high Integrity. God bless this man.
More former 'Gapo Prostis say Noli Me Tangere(WagMo'kong Hipuan)
During the Lenten season, presidential aspirants took the time to bury their blunders and resurrect with a new cycle of growth. At the Lakas-Kampi headquarters, Gloria Arroyo and Gay Gibo start with a heart-to-heart talk.
Ate Glo: Can you turn off that music for the moment? We need to talk.
G.G. (singing with his Apple iPod): “…Livin’ La Vida Loca!..”
Gloria yanks his earphones.
G.G.: What?! I’m listening to Ricky Martin. He finally came out of the closet, and I want to let myself out too! Hindi ko na kaya ate! (I can’t take it anymore, elder sister!)
Ate Glo: Stop talking like that! We need to protect our image. That’s why the Americans have the Don’t-Ask-Don’t-Tell policy enforced in their military. We almost disqualified your cousin and Villar for exceeding their ad airtimes. If we can set them up in similar ways, you’ll win through technicalities. Then you can make me the Prime Minister.
Meanwhile, at the Nacionalista Party headquarters, Danding Cojuangco and M.”Bi” Villar discuss their renewal strategy.
M.”Bi”: Lumampas na ang ad airtime ko. (My ad airtime is now over the limit.)
Danding: ‘Wag ka mag-alala. ‘Di naman nagbibilang ang tao. Tingnan mo ang pagkamatay at pagkabuhay ni Kristo. Sabi n’ya mabubuhay s’ya muli pagkatapos ng TATLONG araw at TATLONG gabi, pero ilang araw at ilang gabi ba mula B’yernes ng hapon haggang sa pagkabuhay ni Kristo bago mag madaling-araw sa Lingo? Ito ang katibayan ni Kristo na s’ya ang D’yos, pero mali ang pag-k’wenta n’ya. Hindi ‘to napapansin ng tao, kaya bakit nila papansinin ang pag-k’wenta ng airtime mo? (Don’t worry. People don’t count. Look at the death and resurrection of Christ. He said that he would rise again after THREE days and THREE nights, but how many days and nights are there from Friday in the afternoon up to his resurrection before sunrise on Sunday? This is Christ’s evidence that He is God, but his calculation is incorrect. People don’t notice this, so why would they notice the accounting of your airtime? )
M.”Bi”: Oo nga ‘no. Dalawang gabi lang ang bilang ko. (Yes, that’s right. I only count two nights.)
Danding: Alam mo, nasiraan ko ang Lolo ni Noynoy, si Don Pepe, at ang Hacienda Luisita n’ya. Kaya ikaw, kaya mo rin ‘yon. (You know, I was able to ruin Noynoy’s grandfather, Don Pepe and his Hacienda Luisita. So you can do that too.)
Simultaneously, a gathering was held at the Liberal Party headquarters. Noynoy speaks to his staff and volunteers.
Noy: Why did I exceed my ad airtime? Didn’t you keep an account of it?
Staff 1: Pasensya ka na kuya. Nakalimutan namin na O.C.—obsessive compulsive—pala ang Comelec. (Please have some patience with us, elder brother. We forgot that the Comelec is O.C.—obsessive compulsive.
Staff 2: And nobody really expects Pinoys to be strict with numbers. That’s why they only hire accounting college graduates as cashiers at SM Department Store, even though other countries require only high school students for that kind of job. People here take numbers loosely.
Noy: OK. Just be careful next time, OK?
Staff (in unison): Yes, sir!!!
Meanwhile, deep within the jungles of Mindanao, the members of Bangon Pilipinas discuss their plans.
MNLF soldier: Brother Eddie, ‘di ka naman Muslim. Bakit mo kami kinakampihan? (Brother Eddie, you’re not Muslim. Why are you on our side?)
Bro. Eddie: S’yempre schizophrenic ‘ata ako. Lahat ng relihiyon at lahat ng tao na sa ‘kin. Kaya sino pa ang maaasahan n’yo? Sino pa e’di AKO! (Of course, that’s because I’m schizophrenic. All religions and all people are within me. So who can you trust? No one else but the Great I AM! Brother Eddie!)
---------------------------------------------
http://syncmyworld.blogspot.com
http://freeasean.tripod.com
http://myconnected.webs.com
---------------------------------------------
Rodney St.Michael
http://freeasean.tripod.com
http://syncmyworld.blogspot.com
http://myconnected.webs.com
We'll vote for Noynoy Aquino!
I will vote for Noynoy Aquino no matter what certain Bellvue commented negatively for him as I believe of all leading contenders in the presidential race, he is more credible to lead this nation from corrupt leaders as I believe for his advocacy to fight corruptions in the bureaucracy.
Although Noynoy Aquino is not perfect leader we have today, he is not as corrupt as Manny Villar and even if Gibo has the best resume for the nation, his (Gibo) chance is slim as he is still struggling in the survey and I doubt his sincerity to the nation over his loyalty to his lady master GMA. Like others, this is only our chance to end GMA regime and electing for her replacement in the person of Noynoy Aquino to make change we need is the best gift I can give to my children.
To Bellvue and other critics of Noynoy Aquino, we welcome your continuous negative attacks or comments against Noynoy Aquino but in our opinion those will not affect and destroy his candidacy as we and his million supporters in the Philippines and abroad still doubling our efforts to get the messages down to the most isolated sitios to ensure Noynoy Aquino’s victory in this coming May 10, 2010.
concerned citizen of the republic!
Mga kababayan ko na umaasa ng mabago pa ang takbo ng ating inang bayan ng Pilipinas....Sana po ay maging alerto tayo at mapagmatyag sa mga pangyayari sa ating lipunan...kung saan man tayo nakatira o napadpad sa mundong ito ay dapat nating ipadama, ikalat at ipamalita sa lahat lahat ang taong karapat dapat na mamuno sa ating mahal na Pilipinas.
Hindi pa huli ang lahat kahit na huli siya sa mga survey at political ads...sige na at samahan niyo po ako na sagipin ang ating Pilipinas...Iboto natin si GILBERT "GIBO" TEODORO...siya lang ang my kakayahan na mamuno ng marangal at tapat sa ating bayan...Please po..nagmamakaawa ako sa inyong lahat...
jp po to from Mindanao and now in Saudi Arabia
jp
The truth about survey
Originally Posted by YellowSubmarine View Post
A TAKE ON SWS AND PULSE ASIA SURVEYS
Share
Saturday, March 27, 2010 at 1:20am
Login | Facebook
Not only have I been studying and teaching statistics as a college instructor, but I have also been using it as a scientist and researcher for quite some time now. However, it was only during the early morning of March 26, 2010 that I thought of trying to scrutinize SWS and Pulse Asia surveys from a statistical standpoint. Although SWS and Pulse Asia never reveal how they actually conduct the surveys (aside from indicating the questions asked, the number of respondents, and the margin of error they set) and that they usually argue that their methods are "tried and tested" ones, I think it would not hurt if we try to take a look at how representative their survey results are of the entire population of registered voters, using another generally accepted and "tried and tested" method we use in statistics.
I'm talking about Slovin's formula.
It is only from members of a sample (as respondents) that data would be obtained through a survey, since a census (or gathering data from the entire population) is not feasible for data gathering given a short span of time and limited resources. It is important, however, that the sample used be as representative of the population as possible, so that inferences derived from analysis of sample data may be more or less applicable to the whole population. This may be ensured by using appropriate sampling methods and using appropriate sample sizes.
In statistics, Slovin's formula is a generally accepted way of how to determine the size appropriate for a sample to ensure better representation of the population of a known size. The formula may be expressed as follows:
n = N / (1 + Ne^2)
where n = sample size
N = population size
e = margin of error
Again, in the context of SWS and Pulse Asia surveys, these groups could argue that they use formulas other than Slovin's formula in coming up with sample sizes of 2,100 and 1,800 respondents respectively (I did a review of news clips from the ABS-CBN News web site, and noted that these two figures are the most commonly used sample sizes of the two survey groups). However, if we use Slovin's formula (which is, again, a generally accepted and commonly used method in statistics), rather alarming ideas may be derived (alarming, considering how some Filipinos base and defend their decisions on who to vote for on survey results).
Considering that both survey groups usually set the margin of error at plus or minus 2 percent (or 0.02), here're what Slovin's formula says about the SWS and Pulse Asia sample sizes (anybody with a considerable aptitude in algebra may verify these):
* SWS's survey over 2,100 respondents, with margin of error set at 0.02, assumes a population composed of only 13,125 individuals. In the context of election-related surveys, that would point to the survey results being possibly representative of a population of 13,125 registered voters nationwide.
* Pulse Asia's survey over 1,800 respondents, with margin of error set at 0.02, assumes a population composed of only 6,429 individuals. In the context of election-related surveys, that would indicate that the survey results may be representative of a population of 6,429 registered voters nationwide.
Now let's see.... Based on Slovin's formula, the SWS sample size seems to assume that there are only 13,125 registered voters, while the Pulse Asia sample size seems to assume that there are only 6,429 registered voters nationwide. How many registered voters are there in the country? Can anyone provide the actual population size of registered voters? Is there anybody reading this who knows anyone from COMELEC? I'm sure there's a definite figure.
Well, with or without the actual figures from COMELEC, I believe 13,125 and 6,429 are gross underestimations of the actual number of registered voters in the country.
I'm not trying to disprove SWS or Pulse Asia here. Again, it is highly likely that they are using methods that do not include Slovin's formula. However, here's my case in point: Before you believe that SWS and/or Pulse Asia survey results are what can actually be expected if elections were held then and there, think more than twice; it is also highly likely that the results may not really be reflective of what the entire Filipino electorate may actually and ultimately reflect, from a statistical standpoint.
And that is not yet considering the sampling method employed by these survey groups.
Hence, to the SWS and Pulse Asia survey frontrunners and their supporters, I suggest for you not to keep your hopes too high, or you may end up disappointing yourselves if the actual results of the elections will not reflect the trends reflected by those survey results. And to survey tailenders and their supporters, there may actually be valid bases for you not to give much credence to these survey results. Quoting from Sen. Gordon: "The real 'survey' is on May 10, 2010."
'Nuff said!
NOYNOY corruption
As they say, sooner or later the truth will come out.
Now, the truth about Noynoy Aquino, the allegedly incorruptible and presidential candidate (at least according to his propagandists masquerading as opinion writers), is catching up with him.
This newspaper reported last week that shortly after People Power, that revolution that benefited Noynoy’s mother, Noynoy established a security agency that provided services to government corporations and even a company of taipans.
Noynoy was then 26 years old. In the incorporation papers of Best Security Agency, a company which carried his initials and which Noynoy ran with his uncle, Len Oreta (husband of former Senator Tessie Aquino Oreta), Noynoy used the address of his mother in Arlegui.
Oreta was chairman and president, Cipriano Lacson was director-treasurer, while Noynoy, George Gaddi, a Customs broker, Bienvenido Reyes, Alexander Lopez (son of former Manila mayor and now Manila Rep. Mel Lopez) were directors. Reyes is now Court of Appeals justice, appointed by President Arroyo. At one point, Noynoy’s agency had close to 1,000 security guards, but now has only about 300, according to Noynoy’s.
The cop-out (palusot) of Noynoy, when asked why he used Arlegui, the late President Cory’s official address, was: “What could I do? I lived in Arlegui at time. What’s so illegal about that?”
Santa Banana, Noynoy’s security agency had as clients facilities and buildings of companies sequestered by the Presidential Commission on Good Government. Others were the Philippine National Oil Company, Asiatrust, Tanduay Distilleries of Lucio Tan and Uniwide.
The Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act is clear on conflicts of interest. “It is unlawful for any person having family or close personal relation with any public official to capitalize or exploit or take advantage of such family or close personal relation by directly or indirectly requesting or receiving any present, gift or material or pecuniary advantage from any other person having some business, transaction, application, request or contract with the government, in which such public official has to intervene.”
My gulay, Noynoy did not only use Arlegui as his official address but used his relation to his late mother as an advantage. And yet, he had the cheek to claim that he never committed a corrupt act.
***
But that’s Aquino—the candidate claiming he’s fighting graft and corruption, presenting himself as untainted and vowing that he won’t steal—for you. Well, what was it with his security agency bagging contracts with government corporations? Wasn’t that a conflict of interest punishable under the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act?
This reminds me, wasn’t this same group of Noynoy in the security agency that got involved, during the Cory regime, in the smuggling of Mercedes Benzes and BMWs from Germany, which led a very reputable finance secretary at that time to resign, but was prevailed upon by Cory to accept another cabinet portfolio? Ask Customs old-timers and they’ll you what happened.
I can only recall what the late acerbic Manila Mayor Arsenic Lacson said of a young councilor: “So young and so corrupt!”
Yes
If Eddie or Villar is not running, he is definitely a man for others.
www.nacionalista.org
I'd vote for him.
If Ninoy or Mar is not running.
He's another man of Integrity.
I think JC is still too young
I think JC is still too young and inexperienced to lead and be president. I think the bishops are putting the country at stake by endorsing JC. It's a big gamble to select somebody who was a councilor running for the highest position. On th debates you can already tell he si lost for ideas and words because he still lacks wisdom and experience and maturity.
President must uphold the "Rule of Law"
Whoever wins, should uphold the Rule of Law! Lawlessness is so shockingly prevalent in Maguindanao, Sulu, and Tawi-tawi that local people feel so helpless.