The foggy financial history of Gloria Arroyo
MULTIMILLION pesos of net growth in stocks, real assets, cash on hand/in bank, and other personal properties could not be accounted for in the statements of assets and liabilities and net worth (SALNs) that President Arroyo filed from 1992 to 2008.
With expert help from tax analysts and fund managers, the PCIJ mapped Arroyo’s financial history in the last 17 years she served as senator, then vice president, and finally, president.
Our findings:
1992: Arroyo declared a P243,936 car loan but acquired no new car. The value of her cars (P800,000) remained the same from 1991. She reported that a residential lot in Antipolo booked at P94,000 but with fair market value of P1.75 million was a “gift purchased” since 1986. Arroyo used another puzzling term, “pro-divided,” for her pricey house and lot in Baguio City.
1994: The sources of Arroyo’s net cash inflow of P595,572 could not be accounted for. The amount includes car loan payment of P533,791, additional P57,411 cash in bank, and P4,347 more in law books.
1995: Arroyo declared variable fair market values for the house and lot in Baguio City that she acquired in 1977 for P350,000. In 1991, she said the “pro-divided” property’s fair market value was P14.9 million. In 1992-94, she said it dipped to P4.9 million. In 1995, she raised it to P27 million, for a 450-percent increase in value in just one year. In 1996-2008, she said the property’s value had risen to P67.9 million.
1995: Arroyo sold two real estate properties – a residential lot in Las Pinas that she acquired in 1989 for P86,715, but which she said had fair market value that year of P922,500; and an island in Cagayan that she said she acquired in 1970 for P8,000 but did not quote any fair market value.
1995: Arroyo bought two pieces of real estate – an agricultural lot in Bulacan for P1.17 million, and a commercial lot in Tayabas, Quezon, for P1 million, but reported no sales or cash inflow amounting to P2.27 million. In addition, she paid P238,010 in car loan, and reported P100,468 more cash on hand/in bank and P500,000 more in stocks. But she reported a P580 decline in the value of her jewelry (P950,580 in 1994, down to P950,000 in 1995).
1995: Arroyo’s property purchases and net cash inflow totaled P3.95 million. If she sold the Las Pinas lot at fair market value of P922,500, she should have disposed the island in Cagayan at multiple times its acquisition value of P8,000 to account for her big net cash inflow.
1996: Arroyo reported no property sale or cash inflows to account for P2, 538,000 in new acquisitions - P1,458,910 worth of additional stocks (P5.8 million in 1996 from P4.4 million in 1995); P180,000 more for race horses (P420,000 from P240,000 in 1995); P148,742 additional cash on hand/in bank (P704,540 from P555,798); P650,000 more in appliances/furniture and office equipment; and P100,000 more in law books.
1997: Arroyo bought an agricultural lot in Nasugbu, Batangas for P550,000 and declared its fair market value at P1.5 million for a 200-percent increase in the same year.
1997: There are no property sales or cash inflows to account for Arroyo’s new acquisitions of P5,107,964, and payment of P341.434 in car loan. Apart from the purchase of the Nasugbu lot, her net cash inflow consisted of P2.2 million more cash on hand/in bank (P2,860,711 in 1997, from only P704,540 in 1996); P180,000 more in race horses; P250,000 more worth of jewelry; P150,000 more in appliances and furniture; P900,000 more in law books; P141,090 more in stocks; P399,000 more in cars; and P1.27 million she spent for improvements on her lot in Nasugbu, Batangas; her house and lot in Baguio; and a condominium unit in Ayala.
1997: For the first time, Arroyo declared “inherited properties in the process of transfer,” following the death of her father, former President Diosdado Macapagal. In 1997, she booked this item at P5.4 million. She continued to enroll it among her “personal and other properties” until 2008, or for 11 years’ running.
A tax analyst could not figure out why: “It is noteworthy that ‘Inherited Properties in process of transfer’ appears on the personal property column. Properties that are subject to registration are normally real property and shares of stock.”
“These assets started appearing starting 1997 (up to 2008),” the analyst noted. “ It cannot be land (since it appears in the personal property side) – if it is not land, what is taking them so long to put it in their name?”
1998: There are no sales or cash inflows to account for acquisitions of P10.4 million, including P207,508 improvements on the Ayala condominium; P3.03 million more cash on hand and in bank; P800,000 more in jewelry; P1 million more in law books; P5 million more in stocks; and P1.08 million more in cars.
1999: Arroyo’s cash on hand/in bank declined by P2.07 million. But she reported acquiring P500,000 more in jewelry; P3 million more of stocks; and reported “inherited properties in process of transfer, Diosdado Macapagal Sr. and Evangelina M. Macapapagal” at a bigger value of P7.43 million.
2000: Arroyo sold her Ayala condominium that she said had fair market value of P23.4 million, and which she reportedly acquired for P619,625 in 1980. Minus the six percent capital gains tax on fair market value, her net proceeds would be P12,604,695. Her cash on hand/in bank, however, went up by P32.6 million. Minus the money she raised from the Ayala condominium, Arroyo’s net cash inflow of P19.95 million could not be accounted for.
2001: Arroyo stopped listing three companies she reported in her SALNs from 1992 to 2000 in which First Gentleman Mike Arroyo had business interests or financial connections. These are the LTA Inc. (real estate) and LTA Realty (real estate agent), both based in Makati City, and JJ Agricultural Corp. (agricultural-family business) based in Bacolod City. From 1992 to 1999, Arroyo said her husband was also involved in Aviatica Travel (travel agent) and the Arroyo Law Office.
2001: In the next seven years or 2007, Arroyo enrolled not a single company in which she or the First Gentleman had any business interests or financial connections.
2001: Arroyo’s stocks suddenly went missing. It was last booked at P7.5 million in 2000. In the next four years or until 2005, Arroyo declared zero stocks. This would return in a huge way in 2006 – already worth P55 million.
2001: Arroyo’s cash on hand/in bank went up by P 17.95 million (up P54.3 million, from just P36.4 million in 2000). Her “inherited properties in process of transfer” declined in value to P1.4 million, from P5.4 million in 2000.
2001: Arroyo reduced by half the value of jewelry (P1.2 million) and kept this figure unchanged in the next two years. In 2004, she said her jewelry nearly tripled in value to P3.4 million, a figure that would remain static in her next five annual SALNs.
2001: The horses (last booked at P600,000) suddenly disappeared from her SALN. If she had given the horses to her sons, without any cash exchange, then she did not raise additional money at all but should have paid donor’s taxes. If she sold the horses, she would have raised P600,000 at least to make up for the increase in her cash assets, but should have also paid capital gains taxes. Whether or not the First Gentleman disposed of his shareholdings in the three companies his wife had listed in prior years is unclear from the president’s SALNs. If he did, the proceeds should have been reflected in the president’s succeeding SALNs, and the First Gentleman should have paid capital gains taxes.
2005: Arroyo bought a piece of raw land in Coron, Palawan supposedly for P2.05 million, but did not indicate its fair market value.
2006: Arroyo’s personal assets went up by P 9,303,564.41, her stocks surged all too suddenly to P55.7 million, but her cash on hand/in bank made a big dip of P44,254,143, and her notes payable rose to P2.14 million. In 2005, she reported having cash on hand/in bank of P55,483,015, and the next year, reported this to have thinned to P11.23 million.
2007: Arroyo’s assets went up by P 7.72 million. She purchased a fishpond in Malolos, Bulacan at book value of P507,800 and again did not indicate its fair market value. Her stocks increased by P7.2 million, even as she did not at this time enroll any companies in which she or her husband had any shareholdings. Her cash on hand/in bank declined by just P37,981, or from P11,228,872 million in 2006 to P11,266,853.
2008: Arroyo reported record net growth in cash and assets of P45.06 million. This included P26.18 million in additional cash on hand/in bank (P37.45 million, or thrice more than the P11.27 million she declared in 2007); and additional stocks of P51.88 million (P110.47 million in 2008, from P62.91 million in 2007). Arroyo also reported taking out a P33-million loan (notes payable) but did not say from which bank or entity.
2008: Arroyo sold her agricultural lot in San Rafael, Bulacan, signing with the First Gentleman the deed of sale on Dec. 23, 2008. Arroyo said she acquired the 2.9-hectare agricultural lot in 1995 for P1.2 million, but said its fair market value by 2007 was only P4.7 million. This is based on her SALNs. In the deed of sale, the First Gentleman said he bought the land in 1996 for only. P100,000. The Arroyos sold the lot for P41.5 million, or nearly 10 times more than the declared fair market value of the lot nestled in the foothills of the Sierra Madre. – PCIJ August 2009
Hay...
@rockymickeyquick: Ang hirap makipag usap sa yo. Sinabi ko na nga na 1) I agree that similar investigations into the presidentiables and other government officials are also warranted. 2) ... these discussions, while important, should not distract us from the fact that this report is further proof of the corruption of this administration. 3) ... I did not address your first post in any of my posts.
Ang mahirap sa ginagawa mo eh binabaling yung usapan. Pilit mong tinuturo si Malou Mangahas, sabihin na natin na 'partisan' itong pag sulat niya at "I MALIWANAG NA NAGPAPARTICIPATE DIN SIYA INDIRECTLY SA CORRUPTION FOR DOING NOTHING", hindi parin nababago na higit na malaki parin ang sala (pagnanakaw sa bayan) nung paksa (GMA) nung kanyang sinulat. Pambihira naman ewan ko kung ano ang hindi malinaw dyan.
to jdlcxxx...
PASENSYA NA JDLCXXX, NGAYON KO LANG NABASA YONG ANSWER MO. YET, YOU STILL MISS MY POINT. ANG GUSTO KONG IPARATING AY, BAKIT HINDI ISINAMA NI MALOU MANGAHAS ANG IBANG CORRUPT NA PRESIDENTIABLES NA DAPAT IMBESTIGAHAN PARA MAKAIWAS TAYO SA ISANG MAPAGSAMANTALANG KANDIDATO SA DARATING NA ELEKSYON, IF ONLY TO SHOW FAIRNESS AT WALA SIYANG PANSARILING MOTIBO? SI GLORIA ISANG TAON NA LANG AALIS NA PERO MAARING HAHABULIN PA RIN SIYA NG TAUMBAYAN. NGUNIT, PAG NAGKAMALI TAYO NG PAGPILI SA SUSUNOD NA ELEKSYON, ANIM NA TAON NA NAMAN TAYONG MAGHIHIKAHOS, MALIWANAG BA?
PAKI-CLICK NA LANG ITONG LINK PARA MO MAINTINDAHAN: http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0921295.html. YEAR 2004 PA YANG RECORD AT HANGGANG NGAYON WALA PANG SUMINGIT DYAN. ANG TANONG, ANONG GINAWA NI MALOU MANGAHAS NOONG PANAHON NA YON HANGGANG NGAYON? EH, DI MALIWANAG NA NAGPAPARTICIPATE DIN SIYA INDIRECTLY SA CORRUPTION FOR DOING NOTHING, DI BA???
ang aking punto de vista
I AM PLEASED WITH THE NEWS THAT MIKEY WELCOMES HIS SALN INVESTIGATION, SANA GANUN DIN ANG MGA MAGULANG NYA. HOWEVER, I HAVE BEEN CLAMORING FOR THE SALN INVESTIGATIONS OF THOSE WHO WANTS TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT DAHIL MAS MATAGL PA ANG IPANUNUNGKULAN NILA PAG NANALO. ANIM NA TAON NA NAMAN TAYONG MAGHIHIRAP KAPAG NAGKAMALI ULIT TAYO NG PAGPILI.
ISANG HALIMBAWA NA LANG AY SI ERAP. AYON SA KANYANG PROFILE AY 36 MILLION PESOS LANG ANG KANYANG DECLARED NETWORTH NOONG 1999. NGUNIT AYON SA INFOPLEASE.COM 78 TO 80 MILLION DOLLARS ANG NAKULIMBAT NI ERAP FROM 1998 TO 2001. TAKE NOTE: "IN DOLLARS", MANTAKIN MO KUNG ILANG PESOS YAN!
KUNG MAHALAGANG IMBESTIGAHAN NATIN SI MIKEY NA DI NAMAN TATAKBO BILANG PRESIDENTE, MAS MAHALAGA SIGURONG IMBESTIGAHAN NATIN SI ERAP AT IBA PANG MAPAGKUNWARING PRESIDENTIAL WANNABES, DI BA???
alm nyo sa totoo lang ang
alm nyo sa totoo lang ang kakapal talaga ng pagmumukha ng mga taong ito, nasa pulitika pala ang magandang negosyo eh.. kaya pala minsan napapa isip ako, na kung bakit ang bawat kandidato ay mismong pinipresenta nila ang kanilang sarili na iboto ng mga taong bayan samantalang d nila naisip ang napakalaking abligasyon na kanilang papasukin, minsan nga pag na eelect na presidente sa PTA halos abot langit ang pag tanggi na d maluklok sa pwesto samatalang skwelahan lang naman ang kanyang paglilingkuran.. pero sa pagiging presidente ng pilipinas e halos gumasto ng malaki para lang ma iboto ng mga pinoy, yun pala e pag naupo na sa pwesto e uunti untiing bawiin ang nagasto sa botohan hanggang sa masanay mauuwi na sa corruption.... BAKIT KAYA D TAYO MAKA PILI NG PRESIDENTE NA UN D PINI PRESINTA ANG SARILI??? kung baga ung halos d gumasto sa eleksyon... ung talagang tao na ang pakay lang talaga ay mamuno sa ating bayan at kuntento na sa sweldo ng isang presidente.. d pa kasi ako nakakakita ng presidente na d yumayaman simula ng nakaupo sa pwesto.... kung walang ganito siguro wala nang pag asa na umunlad ang ating bayan..
Nope.
@rockymickeyquick: Nope I did not miss your point. Perhaps you missed the fact that I did not address your first post in any of my posts. I agree that similar investigations into the presidentiables and other government officials are also warranted.
That being said, my point is that these discussions, while important, should not distract us from the fact that this report is further proof of the corruption of this administration.
"Nangangahulugan ba ito na walong taon tayong nagpaparticipate bago pumutak dahil malapit na ang eleksyon?" - Huli man daw at magaling naihabol parin. Maaring nakatulog nga ang bayan at na-hulog muli sa bitag ng compyansa. Maaring hindi na mapapatalsik ang kasalukuyang administration. Hindi ibig sabihin na hindi parin dapat natin ipagsigawan ang mga pagkakamali (kawalang-hiyaan) na kanilang ginawa. Kung para lang ay sa huli ay itong mga kamalian ay maitala sa kasaysayan para malamaman ng mga susunod na henerasyon at matuto sila na wag tularan ito.
Imbestigahan ng Senado!
Kailangan imbestigahan yan ang magkasala ng ¨corruption¨sa bayan dapat parusahan!A good government shall not cheat...shall not steal...shall not lie!
Thanks for the Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism!
rebuttal
Pareho lang naman ang hangarin natin kabayan. But you missed my point (read my first comment below}. Ang pinagkadiinan ko ay dapat lahat ng opisyales at lalo na ang mga presidentiables ay imbestigahan dahil walong taon pa ang ipanunungkulan ng susunod na presidente at upang makaiwas tayo sa isang mapagsamantalang pangulo. Sasagutin ko ang tanong mo ng isang ring tanong kaibigan. Ikaw na rin ang nagsabi na 1992 pa may milagro ng nangyayari sa SALN ni Arroyo eh, "BAKIT NGAYON LANG NAGLABASAN ITONG MGA NEGATIBONG BALITA KUNG KAILAN MALAPIT NG ELEKSYON? BAKIT NAGHINTAY TAYO NG WALONG TAON??? Sinabi ni Ninoy Aquino na pag hindi mo kinontra ang sistema, "YOU ARE PARTICIPATING IN ITS CORRUPTION AND LAWLESSNESS." Nangangahulugan ba ito na walong taon tayong nagpaparticipate bago pumutak dahil malapit na ang eleksyon?
masagot ko nga
@rockymickeyquick: Maaring tama ka na walang gumawa ng "comprehensive report" tunkol sa mga nakaraang regimen. Pero ano ba nangyari sa nakaraang regimen? Napa-talsik ng maaga hindi ba? Ano ba nangyayari sa _kasalukuyang_ regimen? Hindi ba harap harapan na niloloko ang taong bayan? Maaring may sala din ang media pero kahit na ano pa man ang motibo nila para ilabas ang report na ito, mananatili paring totoo ang laman nung report na yan. Totoo parin na hindi man lang ipaliwanag ng mabuti ng administration kung paano lumago ng mahigit kumulang na 2000% ang kayamanan ni Gloria Arroyo mula 1992.
Ngayon ikaw naman ang tanungin ko. Alam naman natin lahat na "Kanser na yang corruption sa Pilipinas". Dapat ba tanggapin nalang natin yun? Tama ba na gamitin nalang ang argumentong "pulitika lang yan" laban sa lahat ng batikos sa ating pamunuan? Kapag ikaw ba ay ninakawan tatanggapin ba sa korte, kapag sinabi nung magnanakaw na "galit lang siya saakin"? Ano pa kung milyong milyong tao ang ninanakawan.
matanong kita
@JDLCXXX: Iginagalang ko ang pagdepensa mo sa mga peryodista kaibigan pero matanong kita; meron bang peryodista na gumawa ng "comprehensive report" ng corruption sa nakaraang regimen??? Wala di ba? Kung hindi kay Singson, na dating kaibigan ni Erap, hanggang ngayon nagtatamasa pa sila. Alam mo kaibigan, ang aso pag may tangan-tangan na buto, hindi tatahol yan kasi natatakot na malaglag yong buto. Para sa akin pare-pareho lang yang mga pulitiko kasi ang ating sistema ay base sa tinatawag na "patronage politics". Sino bang malakas magbigay ng campaign funds kundi yong mga milyonaryong nagmamay-ari ng malalaking corporation. Paano nila babawiin yong gastos kundi maglalakad ng mga batas at franchises (lobbyist)na pakikinabangan nila ng milyon-milyon at gagatasan ang taumbayan. Kanser na yang corruption sa Pilipinas kaibigan kaya linawan mong paningin mo.
I am just frustrated how Justice runs
I do hope and pray that all the media's effort would result to the prosecution of those criminally liable. Please do include my hometown Sarangani Province. Nilalangaw na lamang mga nai-file na mga reklamo laban sa harap-harapang pangungurakot ng mga opisyales, kasama ng mga kakutsabang mga empleyado ng gobyerno. Please do not divulge my real name. Salamat po.