More lapses in hostage crisis cited

Posted at 08/27/2010 11:27 AM | Updated as of 08/27/2010 11:53 AM

MANILA, Philippines - If the Manila hostage tragedy caught the attention of foreign security analysts on the need to improve police training and equipment, a former director of the Philippine National Police-Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (PNP-CIDG) noticed other key lapses such as failure to establish an isolation line and the absence of a designated officer to deal with media.

Antipolo Rep. Romeo Acop told ANC’s “Headstart” on Thursday that the police operations team broke some procedural rules, which were still in place when he was PNP-CIDG head.

He also agreed with most of the points raised by security analyst Charles Shoebridge in an article published by BBC. (Click here for article.)

He disagreed, however, that the Manila Police District’s (MPD) Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) personnel lacked "determination."

Acop said SWAT officials had a hard time dealing with hostage-taker Rolando Mendoza because of lack of necessary equipment.

"I do not agree with that (determination). Kung titignan mo yung pangyayari, ang dala na lang nila yung tapang nila, eh. You must remember that the hostage-taker is armed and some of the SWAT members have no bullet-proof vests," he added.

Acop listed down the procedural lapses committed by police during the hostage rescue fiasco:

1. Failure to establish isolation line

Acop said one of the MPD’s procedural lapses was its failure to establish an "isolation line" to ensure that innocent bystanders are not hurt. "It is standard operating procedure that the scene of the incident must be isolated especially in hostage-taking incidents," he said.

The line, he explained, can be determined by identifying the hostage-taker's gun. Last Monday, the hostage-taker was reported to be carrying an M-16 Armalite rifle and a .45 caliber handgun. The maximum effective range of M-16 is 350 meters.

"It is very crucial, very critical that a police line should be established, na hindi mahu-hurt yung mga tao. The scene of the incident should be isolated, taking into consideration the maximum fire range. Kung 'yung distance ng mga tao ay less than 350 meters, dangerous pa rin 'yun kasi yung max effective range andun sa range na yun," he added.

2. Slow in addressing hostage-taker’s demands

Acop said the ground commander handling hostage situations should act and think quickly, particularly with the demands being made.

"Yung demands (ng hostage-taker), dapat i-examine ng ground commander and ng crisis management team kung maibibigay, kasi iyun ang foremost consideration natin," he said.

The crisis management team, usually headed by the local government chief, can also coordinate with police in granting demands.

3. Failure to tap Special Action Force

Acop said it was also a judgment call of the ground commander, Chief Superintendent Rodolfo Magtibay, whether to deploy the Special Action Force (SAF).

Director Leocadio Santiago Jr., National Capital Region Police Office chief, could have also made a decision to use SAF troops to free the hostages.

"Maybe in their assessment, the SWAT team is capable of handling the situation," he said.

Acop said resolving hostage-taking incidents usually takes time as the police’s primary aim is to free the victims.

He added that an armed assault can only be launched after negotiations bog down.

4. Poor negotiating team and skills

Acop said Mendoza’s relatives should not have been on the scene unless the hostage-taker demanded to see them.

In the August 23 hostage crisis, police brought Mendoza's family in the area and even allowed the hostage-taker’s brother, Gregorio Mendoza, to help in the negotiations.

When the brother was taken into police custody, it caused a commotion that Mendoza saw on television.

It reportedly caused him to run amok leading to the tragedy.

“Yung negotiator ang kanyang number one trait is objectivity. How can a relative be objective? Hindi na dapat dinala yan, lalo na sa ating Filipino, yung relationship or family ties ay very close. Baka akala ni negotiator ma-co-convince pero according to the book, no," Acop said.

Acop said one of the main protocols implemented in a hostage-taking incident is creation of an objective negotiating team that directly reports to the ground commander.

The negotiator needs to make sure that the hostage-taker is not agitated and look for opportunities to disarm him.

Shoebridge pointed out that MPD lost numerous opportunities to disarm Mendoza, but Acop said a move to subdue a hostage-taker needs a judgment call from the negotiator.

Acop added that an assault against the hostage-taker should not be made during negotiations.

He said a ground commander must order an assault when the degree of success for the assault team is very high, when negotiations bog down, or when the hostage-taker has harmed the hostages.

5. No designated officer to rein in media

Acop said the ground commander must also decide on a need to require media to stop airing live footage of the scene.

"Well, if the ground commander approved the taking of the footage of the incident, why not? That’s why it is very necessary that a ground commander is there so he could decide," he said.

He added that the police should have designated a police spokesman to address media-related issues during the crisis.

"I cannot blame media simply because wala ang opisyal na magko-control," he said.

6. Lack of actual experience

Shoebridge said in his BBC article that the MPD was obviously not trained for such rescue operations.

Acop, however, said what the MPD lacked was actual experience. He explained that SWAT members trained using passenger buses, which is different from tourist buses.

"Yung training ng SWAT, ang ginagamit na props, yung local buses. Kapag minaso, basag agad ang salamin. 'Yung windows ng (tourist) bus, sa tingin ko not made of glass but made of fiberglass kaya hindi nabasag agad. They were surprised kasi hindi yun ang nagagawa nila sa training," he said.

Acop said the police may have failed to properly assess the hostage-taking incident, which could explain why the they failed to bring gas masks and ladders.

The gap in training and actual experience should be bridged by the senior commanders, who are being sent to overseas training, he said.

He added that senior police officers should create a "doctrine" that could guide rescue operations.

"Unfortunately, it was not included in their operational procedures. Ang gumawa dapat nyan, yung nag-training natin na officials sa (United States) on subjects such as hostage-taking. When I last checked, around March 2010, wala nun," he said.


Bookmark and Share

6 comments

=============== h t t p : /

=============== h t t p : / / w w w . p o p b u y n o w . c o m
==============
Hello, summer, good place for shopping, fashion, sexy, personality, maturity, from here to begin. Are you ready?
free shipping
competitive price
any size available
accept the paypal Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33 Nike shox(R4,NZ,OZ,TL1,TL2,TL3) $35 Handbags(Coach lv fendi d&g) $35 Tshirts (ed hardy,lacoste) $16 Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30 Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,gucci,Armaini) $16 New era cap $15 Bikini (Ed hardy) $25 ============== h t t p : / / w w w . p o p b u y n o w . c o m
===============


What does Maria Ressa have to

What does Maria Ressa have to say regarding Ron Gagalac's manner of reporting? I'm sure Gagalac's over-acting and excited voice and editorializing have contributed to the hostage takers agitation. I was watching ANC from around 6 pm till the crisis ended and I was wondering why nobody cut short Gagalac. Ces Drillon kept her cool, Julius Babao and George Carino were quite calm too.

SeniorCitizen


just a clarification for

just a clarification for extreme060423, if you were paying attention to that segment you would have heard the explanation prior to showing the video where Maan Macapagal and Ted Failon said that in view of preserving the crime scene, the video was shot not by their cameramen but by SOCO agents. So I hope that clears this up. Now with regards to the issue, I believe that it's not enough that we point out what went wrong and what shortcomings were seen. I believe offering solutions and countermeasures would be of help. In fairness to Cong. Acop, he gave several points and solutions. One problem though, he also mentioned that he found out about those problems while he was still with the police forces. so why did he not raise those points before? even after he left the force, why did he not let the police chiefs know about these problems? if he had, the circustances could have been different. In any case, I still salute Cong. Acop for coming forward and providing help. Again, these are just my point of views, and I do not claim be a know-it-all guy. all i know is that we need to stick together and work through this adversity for us to succeed. we don't need the political bickerings of those GMA slaves, example herewith is Cong. Edcel Lagman. Because until we realize that national unity is the only key to success, then this country is doomed to the dogs.....


Reminds Me of the Tittle of a Movie

extreme060423 has a valid point. Although I did not see the said video myself and I have no reason to doubt its existence, then if ABS-CBN's Maan Macapagal and a her cameraman were allowed to enter the hostage bus after the tragic incident concluded, then somebody has to explain why this was allowed to happen.

The police allowed civilians to enter that bus? And didn't Maan Macapagal realize that she was contaminating the crime scene by entering that bus?

Is this a case of "Dumb and Dumber"?


Three More Major Post Hostage Lapses

The first major post hostage lapse was when P-Noy smiled when he visited the crime scene as well as during his press conference. (i haven't seen his talked about medical record though). The third major lapse was when local policemen posed in front of the ill ill fated bus for a photo oooooppps!!!!

mang Juan

ABSCBN VIDEO FOOTAGE OF THE CRIME SCENE

Why did they allow Maan Macapagal and her cameraman to get inside the bus after the hostage taking incident. On the video shown on TV Patrol anchored by Ted Failon, Maan Macapagal reported while taking video footages of the crime scene while crime scene opratives are doing their investigation on the background. ISN'T THIS AGAINST THE LAW? They could have tampered important evidences that could affect the investigation of the crime scene operatives. This is again a clear lapse of the authorities to control the media in their coverage. On the part of Maan Macapagal, she should have used her common sense and not go beyond the limits in doing her coverage just to get a scoop. This was overlooked and never discussed on TV and Radio related to the topic.



Links