Isko: Hostage crisis was one of national concern
MANILA, Philippines - As far as Manila Vice Mayor Isko Moreno is concerned, the local government responded with great effort to the hostage crisis last August 23 until the police took over to bring down the gunman.
He said, however, that the crisis had become an incident that should have been handled by the national government.
In his testimony before the Incident Investigation and Review Committee, the vice mayor insisted the local crisis management committee, which handles local crisis situations, was immediately “formed” when Manila Mayor Alfredo Lim learned of the happenings at the Quirino Grandstand.
Pressed by the members of the review committee, however, Moreno—Francisco Domagoso in real life—admitted he does not know the “composition” of the crisis management committee.
Under the rules, the city mayor automatically becomes the chairman of the committee and the vice mayor as the vice-chairman. Representatives from the city health office, non-government organizations, Department of Social Welfare and Development, among others, are under this crisis committee.
“The mayor, from the beginning, already ordered the department heads to stand by…the city provided doctors, etc…ito ang tulong ng syudad,” he said.
He could not determine, however, if the so-called members were at the command post, established at that time to be at the police station.
Letter from the Ombudsman
Moreno stressed he himself volunteered to go to the Office of the Ombudsman to get the commitment of the agency to respond to the demand of the gunman, dismissed police officer Rolando Mendoza.
It took him about 3 hours to get to the place and back to the command post to deliver the letter, which basically stated Ombudsman Merceditas Gutierrez’s personal handling of Mendoza’s case.
He mentioned there was a verbal agreement with the officials of the agency that the case will be dealt with in the next 10 days.
Moreno said he was “excited” and confident that the letter was already “enough” to pacify Mendoza. He described that Mendoza “courteously” thanked him for the efforts.
It would later be learned, however, that Mendoza considered the letter wanting and a “garbage.”
Moreno denied he was informed of one of the requests of Mendoza that the case also be brought to the Department of Justice (DoJ).
He also did not know of the other demands, such as the gunman’s reinstatement to the service.
Had he known, he said he would have “moved heaven and earth” to do everything, albeit “under duress.”
Mendoza’s agitation
Upon arriving back at the command center, Moreno immediately gave the letter to the negotiators.
At that time, he already saw at the command center Lim and other high-ranking officials of the Manila Police District.
Gregorio, Mendoza’s brother, was also there, he said.
He said Lim allowed Gregorio to enter the hostage scene in the hope that police will make another breakthrough in the crisis.
Later, however, Superintendent Orlando Yebra, the head negotiator, brought back Gregorio inside the command post, accusing him of conspiracy. Gregorio supposedly told Mendoza not to give in until the police gave back his gun, which was confiscated before he was allowed to go near Mendoza.
It was also during that time that Moreno heard the first gunshot, which he described as off-putting.
Mayor Lim and the police officials had a meeting thereafter, probably to talk about the incident and what to do with Gregorio, Moreno said.
He would later hear Lim order the police to “escort” the brother to the main office at the United Nations Avenue.
Moreno monitors on television
Upon learning that Lim had left for the new command post at the Emerald Restaurant, Moreno said he already left the hostage scene and went to the nearby Manila Pavilion to have coffee and monitor the incidents on television.
“When the mayor left, my belief was that, since I did not know the structure of the crisis management committee, this is now police situation…Umeskerda na ako,” he said.
This was further highlighted by the fact that on his way out, the Special Weapons And Tactics (SWAT) group, were already preparing to enter the scene.
He even wished them luck, he said.
Of national crisis
Despite the efforts of the local government, Moreno said the hostage crisis had already reached a national crisis level.
“I’m not a specialist…but I believe on a personal level, kung involved na foreigners, sana dumating na national government…dapat kabahagi na ng problema…That’s my personal opinion,” he said.
Moreno revealed that, early in the day, members from the foreign media had been trying to call him on his cellphone.
He also noted there were even representatives from the Chinese embassy who went to the command post to personally look into the situation.
Iwas pusoy
Isko, sayang ok ka pa naman sana sa akin para sa susunod na alkalde.
Kaso, sa Manila nangyari ito, kung saan ikaw ang bise-alkalde. Marami ka pang dapat matutunan, bata, kung nangangarap kang maging alkalde. Paturo ka kay Mayor Lim, magaling "magpalutang" yan.
O baka naman gusto mo, Presidente na rin humawak ng Maynila?
mandate in my opinion
The Prez should be careful, because he only garnered 42 percent of the popular vote, that means, if isa lang ang kalaban nya, matatalo sya. but the other remaining 58% percent went to the other candidates. (8 other prez candidates + 1 disqualified KBL )
re:mandate in my opinion
While it's true that the majority voted for candidates other than PNoy, we can't conclude that they are united in voting for a candidate against PNoy should it be a 1 on 1 race. The majority simply prefer their candidate over the 7 others. We can't say how will the majority re-aligns if this were a 2 man race for the presidency.
If you look back in our history, none of the winners in a multi-party environment got more than 50% of the vote. PNoy's 42% is the highest with Erap's winning (30+) percentage in 1998 coming in only in second place.
Hey is for the horses
But hey, where is the church's statement when you needed them the most, they could volunteer to become the hostages. just kidding.
to agree or to disagree
I agree.
“You have x hrs to surrender, etc." then it implies that you have given him/her a chance to give up, beyond that, do whatever in order to save the lives of the hostages. And this includes to:
KEEP THE HOSTAGE TAKER TALKING, in order to buy some time for you to implement and execute a plan to save the hostages, to gather intel ( how many hostage taker, etc ), to keep him off-guard or pre-occupied, ( he's holding the cell phone, he's waving at you ,He’s eating etc ) and use deception, after all you are dealing under the barrel of a gun. and of course it's nice if no one gets hurt.
All who use a sword will be killed by a sword - Matthew 26:52
Some say it becomes an international incident because it involves foreign nationals. It is a national issue because it affects the tourism industry, and the country as a whole.
and also maybe next time do a delayed telecast and perhaps have one spokesperson from the goverment.
and for the civilian spectator please you know what to do next time.
I do not agree
I do not agree with one of the committee member's apparent viewpoint that when opportunities are present, the negotiators should have grabbed Mendoza and subdue him. Simply because of BIG IFs. If they were not be able to successful subdue him, can they handle the consequences? Why do I ask? Firstly because even if they say they are capable, uncertainty exist, just like when the MPD SWAT said they are ready for the assualt, misjudgement is possible. Secondly is that Mendoza had trigger finger on his fire arm, in the process of grabbing, he could have all the possibility to fire or misfire his weapon. Thirdly, they are not even sure if Mendoza planted explosives inside the bus, what if there was and in grabbing Mendoza the detonator was accidentally triggered? Fourthly, it will affect the negotiator's credibility in his future negotiations with other hostage takers. And lastly, it is good policy and sound judgement for negotiators to continue negotiator if they see that release of hostage is possible through continued negotiation instead of taking undue risks.
with great power comes great responsibility
The president should be on top things esp if it involves national concern.
He receives a lot of suggestion but at the end of the day he must be the one to decide and no action will take place without his knowledge.
He must decide and not delegate everything to the local authorities. Even the police force/SWAT is just taking orders.
The waiting and wear-out tactic used for small time crimes clearly showed that they underestimated the situation involving foreign people.
We have the elite forces from the army and they use the SWAT instead.
Poor judgement and poor orders are present because our president is not present, hands-off and misinformed.
buti pa si isko, narealize nya na national concern ito..
si Pnoy, hindi???
wtf?
i agree 100%
i agree 100%
i agree 100%
i agree 100%