Senate respects SC TRO on Corona dollar accounts
02/14/2012 2:21 AM
Nanaig ang desisyon sa Senate impeachment court na igalang ang temporary restraining order ng Korte Suprema laban sa pagbubuklat ng sinasabing dollar accounts ni Chief Justice Renato Corona. Ito'y matapos pagbotohan ng mga senator-judge ang usapin na sa tingin ng ilan ay posibleng mitsa ng isang constitutional crisis. Magba-Bandila, Ryan Chua. Bandila, Pebrero 13, 2012, Lunes
Corona, Carpio-Morales trade barbs
05/26/2012 2:35 AM
05/26/2012 2:35 AM
Sydney light display wows crowd
05/26/2012 2:04 AM
05/26/2012 2:04 AM
Marvel comic book writer in PH
05/26/2012 2:01 AM
05/26/2012 2:01 AM
What happened to past Idol winners?
05/26/2012 1:57 AM
05/26/2012 1:57 AM
Organized and Well Funded Smear Campaign
The alleged dollar accounts of the chief justice is now the subject of the ongoing inquiry of the office of the ombudsman. this is the new weapon of pnoy and his administration in his organized and well funded effort to defame the good name of the chief justice. the chief justice should expect more of this kind of issues sprouting from nowhere that is comparable to a "tsismis"and government bodies riding to the administration propaganda.
the issue of the alleged bank accounts of corona is something that the prosecution did not even alleged in their impeachment complaint. the information being circulated to the yellow media like abs-cbn is nothing but mere scrap of papers that has no bearing to the on-going impeachment yet abs-cbn gives prime space and airtime to "incredible" people who got nothing to do with their lives. abs-cbn gives time to any person who can throw accusations against the chief justice using manufactured documents that doesn't even pass the lowest form of evidence which is prima facie evidence.
abs-cbn news, the inquirer, yellow journalist like ted failon, henry omaga diaz, paid columnist like conrado de quiros, william esposo, paid blogger like raissa robles are just very few of the people that are part of the smear campaign against the chief justice. these people have no credibility whatsoever. these people pretending to be journalist. they are nothing but modern day tsismosos and tsismosas. they use all sorts of documents with questionable validity. they play the role of an expert in examining documents. they claim to have information against the chief justice when infact, all they got was garbage and manufactured information coming from faceless people who constantly circulate damaging information against the chief justice. all the handiwork of the mentally handicapped president! he used gerry leal of BSP to look into corona's bank accounts violating the law in bank secrecy. he used the DOJ and the useless hog de lima. he used the prostituted congress and the pork barrel to get back at the chief justice. however, he is having a hard time using the senate.
CJ we are with you in this fight! pnoy can never reclaim SC and appoint a subservient CJ to reclaim the hacienda!!!
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
the house prosecution panel claimed major victory as the senate impeachment court decided to accept evidences, testimonies and documents submitted by PS bank officials. but what could be the repercussions of such decision by the senate impeachment court to our judicial system, to the impeachment court, and to the entire proceeding?
sec. 2 of article 3 (bill of rights) provides protection to citizens for unreasonable searches and seizures by the government or its agent. apparently, the senate committee on banks is conducting an investigation regarding the alleged "leaked bank" document of CJ corona. all evidences and testimonies so far points to BSP's Jerry Leal. in case senate committee on banks concludes and say that jerry leal of BSP is the source of the leaked bank document, then it is evident that this government is violating the constitutional right of the accuse (section 2 of Art. 3 BR).
and what if the defense panel decides to bring the issue to SC and SC's decision contradicts the senate ruling? it will erode further the credibility of the impeachment court to try and hear the case. if the senate committee on banks says that leal was the source of the leaked bank document, then it would clearly contradict the decision of the senate impeachment court to accept evidences and testimonies from PS Bank. this would mean that the senate impeachment court condones an illegal and despicable act of BSP, leal and and this government. it will cause an irreparable injury to the defendant.
is JPE willing to sacrifice the constitutional right of the accuse and the credibility of the impeachment court in exercise of liberality pending an investigation of the senate committee on banks?
if this can happen to the chief justice, then it could happen to you, to me or to any person for that matter if so and when the emperor in the palace decides you're one of his political foes!
WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?
the house prosecution panel claimed major victory as the senate impeachment court decided to accept evidences, testimonies and documents submitted by PS bank officials. but what could be the repercussions of such decision by the senate impeachment court to our judicial system, to the impeachment court, and to the entire proceeding?
sec. 2 of article 3 (bill of rights) provides protection to citizens for unreasonable searches and seizures by the government or its agent. apparently, the senate committee on banks is conducting an investigation regarding the alleged "leaked bank" document of CJ corona. all evidences and testimonies so far points to BSP's Jerry Leal. in case senate committee on banks concludes and say that jerry leal of BSP is the source of the leaked bank document, then it is evident that this government is violating the constitutional right of the accuse (section 2 of Art. 3 BR).
and what if the defense panel decides to bring the issue to SC and SC's decision contradicts the senate ruling? it will erode further the credibility of the impeachment court to try and hear the case. if the senate committee on banks says that leal was the source of the leaked bank document, then it would clearly contradict the decision of the senate impeachment court to accept evidences and testimonies from PS Bank. this would mean that the senate impeachment court condones an illegal and despicable act of BSP, leal and and this government. it will cause an irreparable injury to the defendant.
is JPE willing to sacrifice the constitutional right of the accuse and the credibility of the impeachment court in exercise of liberality pending an investigation of the senate committee on banks?
if this can happen to the chief justice, then it could happen to you, to me or to any person for that matter if so and when the emperor in the palace decides you're one of his political foes!
Senator Judges
Sometimes the majority only means that all the corrupt are on the same side....