PSBank official nanindigan na peke ang dokumento ng prosekusyon


Sumentro na naman ang impeachment trial sa usapin kung paano napasakamay ng prosekusyon ang kopya ng umano'y bank records ni Chief Justice Renato Corona. Kanina ay lumabas ang posibilidad na mismong sa gobyerno nanggaling ang mga dokumento. Live mula sa Senado nagpa-Patrol si Ryan Chua. TV Patrol, Pebrero 20, 2012, Lunes

02/20/2012 10:01 PMBookmark and Share

2 comments

BETRAYAL OF PUBLIC ( MARITAL TRUST )

by thiefjustice on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 05:29

BETRAYAL OF PUBLIC( MARITAL TRUST)

Thief Justice Renato Corona wants to project the image that he is a loving husband to his wife, Cristina. The fact is, the Chief Justice has not only betrayed the public trust but most importantly, has betrayed his marital vow.

If the Thief Justice is man enough, He should admit the fact that he has a long-standing romantic relationship with a gentle lady named EVA with whom the Thief Justice has two (2) illegitimate sons. EVA also hails from Batangas and had her education from Assumption College just like his wife Cristina who also graduated earlier from the same school.

For Chief Justice Renato C. Corona not to mention his children with EVA as if they do not exist at all, is the highest form of ignominy and immorality that he can commit not only against his legitimate wife and family but against his oath as the highest magistrate of the land.

An inquiry into his relationship with EVA and his illegitimate children in connection with the on-going impeachment trial becomes extremely necessary in the light of the properties given by the Chief Justice to them. EVA, who has previously undergone a heart bypass operation, is known not to have worked from the time she had this romantic liaison with the Thief Justice nor does she have any known business of her own and yet, EVA is luxuriously living in the United States, together with her two (2) illegitimate children with the good Chief Justice.

The SALN of CJ Corona does not indicate any such properties.

And the reason for the frequent trips of CJ Corona to the United States, the latest of which was late last year, was to visit EVA and his children with her. That CJ Corona could afford to support the kind of luxurious lifestyle of EVA and her children in the U.S. is certainly for the Thief Justice to explain considering his small salary.

A simple investigation on the identity and circumstances of EVA can easily be done by a simple inquisition in Batangas as well as from the classmates, relatives and friends of EVA and of CJ Corona.

I know these facts because EVA is a relative of mine and it pains me immensely to see the Thief Justice professing his love for Cristina on nationwide television when he has confessed to...show more show less


OBSFUSCATION DEFENSE

by pilosopong hangal on Tue, 02/21/2012 - 04:16

calling all impeachment prosecutors:

1. realize that anything that detracts from the main issues of this impeachment process is a tactical win for the defense. if you have not figured it out yet, the main issues are corona's continued fitness to be a justice and the cj of the sc and his now uncovered ill-gotten wealth.

2. to avoid the impeachment getting sidetracked by these collateral issues, move that the senate immemdiately issue a ruling as to whether supposedly illegally obtained evidence will still be considered by the senate. also, move that the issue of violation of confidentiality of bank records by any member of the prosecution be dealt with AFTER the impeachment decision by the senate, as it is a collateral matter better left for later investigation and deliberation by the senators. if you haven't realized it yet, it is now the prosecutors that are being put to "trial," a classic defense maneouver to focus the eyes of the "jury judges" on something else other than the meaning and importance of the evidence. this is what the oj simpson defense attorneys did to officer james furman of the lapd (made him the racist villain), remember?

3. insist that the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine does not apply in impeachment proceedings; therefore, there is no need for the impeachment court to divert its attention from the main purpose of the process.